Martha Nussbaum, “The Monarchy of Fear”

Martha Nussbaum discusses her book, “The Monarchy of Fear” at Politics and Prose on 7/9/18.

One of the country’s leading moral philosophers, Nussbaum cuts through the acrimony of today’s political landscape to analyze the Trump era through one simple truth: that the political is always emotional. Starting there, she shows how globalization has produced feelings of powerlessness that have in turn fed resentment and blame. These have erupted into hostility against immigrants, women, Muslims, people of color, and cultural elites. Drawing on examples from ancient Greece to Hamilton, Nussbaum shows how anger and fear inflame people on both the left and right; by illuminating the powerful role these passions play in public life, she points to ways we can avoid getting caught up in the vitriol that sustains and perpetuates divisive politics.

Richard Wolff: “Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism” | Talks at Google

Richard D. Wolff is Professor of Economics Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst where he taught economics from 1973 to 2008. He is currently a Visiting Professor in the Graduate Program in International Affairs of the New School University in New York City. He wrote Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism and founded www.democracyatwork.info, a non-profit advocacy organization of the same name that promotes democratic workplaces as a key path to a stronger, democratic economic system. Professor Wolff discusses the economic dimensions of our lives, our jobs, our incomes, our debts, those of our children, and those looming down the road in his unique mixture of deep insight and dry humor. He presents current events and draws connections to the past to highlight the machinations of our global economy. He helps us to understand political and corporate policy, organization of labor, the distribution of goods and services, and challenges us to question some of the deepest foundations of our society. For more of his lectures, visit the Democracy at Work YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/democrac….

Capitalism will eat democracy — unless we speak up | Yanis Varoufakis

Have you wondered why politicians aren’t what they used to be, why governments seem unable to solve real problems? Economist Yanis Varoufakis, the former Minister of Finance for Greece, says that it’s because you can be in politics today but not be in power — because real power now belongs to those who control the economy. He believes that the mega-rich and corporations are cannibalizing the political sphere, causing financial crisis. In this talk, hear his dream for a world in which capital and labor no longer struggle against each other, “one that is simultaneously libertarian, Marxist and Keynesian.”
DNA has degenerated it is rather because
one can be in government today and not
in power because power has migrated from
the political to the economic sphere
which is separate indeed I spoke about
my quarrel with capitalism if you think
about it it is a little bit like a
population of predators that are so
successful in decimating the prey that
they must feed on that in the end they
starve
similarly the economic sphere has been
colonizing and cannibalizing the
political sphere to such an extent that
it is undermining itself causing
economic crisis corporate power is
increasing political goods are devaluing
inequality is rising aggregate demand is
falling and CEOs of corporations are too
scared to invest the cash of their
corporations so the more capitalism
succeeds in taking the demons out of
democracy the taller between peaks at
the greater the waste of human resources
and humanity’s wealth clearly if this is
right we must reunite the political and
economic sphere and better do it with
Adiemus being in control like in ancient
Athens except we are the slaves or the
exclusion of women and migrants now this
is not an original idea the marxist left
had that idea 100 years ago and it
didn’t go very well did the lesson that
we learned from the soviet the battle
is that only by a miracle with the
working poor be rien powered as they
were in ancient Athens without creating
new forms of brutality and waste but
there is a solution
eliminate the working poor capitalism is
doing it by replacing low-wage workers
with automata androids robots the
problem is that as long as the economic
and the political spheres are separate
automation makes the Twin Peaks taller
the waist loftier and the social
conflicts deeper including soon I
believe in places like China so we need
to reconfigure we need to reunite
economic and the political spheres but
we better do it by democratizing the
reunified sphere less to end up with a
surveillance mad hypocracy that makes
the matrix the movie look like a
documentary so the question is not
whether capitalism will survive the
technological innovations it is spawning
the more interesting question is whether
capitalism will be succeeded by
something resembling a matrix dystopia
or something much closer to a star
trek-like society where machines serve
the humans and the humans expend their
energies exploring the universe and
indulging in long debates about the
meaning of life in some ancient Athenian
like high-tech Agora I think we can
afford to be optimistic but what would
it take what would it look like to have
this star trek-like utopia instead of
the matrix like dystopia

Friendship and the Democratic Process: Kwame Anthony Appiah (Onbeing)

Philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah offers hope for quiet, sustained culture shift through the “endless shared conversation” of friendship. The writer of the New York Times “Ethicist” column studies how deep social change happens across time and cultures. “If you have that background of relationship between individuals and communities that is conversational, then when you have to talk about the things that do divide you, you have a better platform.”

If you have that background of relationship between individuals and communities that is, in that sense, conversational, then when you have to talk about the things that do divide you, you have a better platform. You can begin with the assumption that you like and respect each other even though you don’t agree about everything, and you can maybe build on that. And you can know that, at the end of the conversation, it’s quite likely that you’ll both think something pretty close to what you both thought at the start. But people who’ve been heard and whose position is understood — this is one of the great virtues of democracy when it’s working — tend to be more willing to accept an outcome that they wouldn’t have chosen because they feel they’ve had voice; they’ve participated in the process.