The Republican Strategy To Repeal Dodd-Frank

The repeal of Dodd-Frank will not come in one fell swoop. Rather House Republicans are moving in several stages to reduce the scope of the Volcker Rule and to gut its effectiveness.

.. Now that Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo already have the extension through 2017, they immediately ask for… an extension through 2019.

 

.. The House Republican rhetoric will be “technical fixes” and “job creation”. But the reality is that they are determined to strip away all meaningful restrictions imposed on Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, and other megabanks – and to roll-back Dodd-Frank as far as possible, until it becomes meaningless or they are finally able to repeal it completely.

 

Big Banks and Derivatives: Why Another Financial Crisis Is Inevitable

The world’s scariest story: trading in derivatives

Bad as these scandals are and vast as the money involved in them is by any normal standard, they are mere blips on the screen, compared to the risk that is still staring us in the face: the lack of transparency in derivative trading that now totals in notional amount more than $700 trillion. That is more than ten times the size of the entire world economy. Yet incredibly, we have little information about it or its implications for the financial strength of any of the big banks.

.. Public confidence in banks is now at a record low. According to Gallup, in the late 1970s, around 60 percent of Americans said they trusted big banks “a great deal” or “quite a lot.” In June 2012, less than 25 percent of respondents told Gallup they had faith in big banks.

But it’s not just public confidence. Specialists are equally bewildered. The Atlantic cites:

  • Ed Trott, a former Financial Accounting Standards Board member, when asked whether he trusted bank accounting, he said, simply, “Absolutely not.”
  • Several financial executives told The Atlantic that they see the large banks as “complete black boxes.”
  • A chief executive of one of the nation’s largest financial institutions considers banks “uninvestable,” a Wall Street neologism for “untouchable.”
  • Paul Singer, who runs the influential investment fund Elliott Associates, wrote to his partners this summer, “There is no major financial institution today whose financial statements provide a meaningful clue” about its risks.
  • Arthur Levitt, the former chairman of the SEC, lamented to us in November that none of the post-2008 remedies has “significantly diminished the likelihood of financial crises.”
  • A recent survey by Barclays Capital found that more than half of institutional investors did not trust how banks measure the riskiness of their assets.
  • When hedge-fund managers were asked how trustworthy they find “risk weightings”—the numbers that banks use to calculate how much capital they should set aside as a safety cushion in case of a business downturn—about 60 percent of those managers answered 1 or 2 on a five-point scale, with 1 being “not trustworthy at all.” None of them gave banks a 5.
  • A disturbing number of former bankers have recently declared that the banking industry is broken, including Herbert Allison, the ex-president of Merrill Lynch and former head of the Obama administration’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, Philip Purcell (ex-CEO of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter), Sallie Krawcheck (ex-CFO of Citigroup), David Komansky (ex-CEO of Merrill Lynch), and John Reed (former co-CEO of Citigroup) and Sandy Weill, another ex-CEO of Citigroup. The Atlantic notes that “this newfound clarity typically follows their passage from financial titan to rich retiree.”

How Wall St. got its way

But last month the Fed’s top lawyer delivered a particularly blunt critique that proved golden to the industry.

“You can tell that was written at 2:30 in the morning and so that needs to be I think revisited just to make sense of it,” Federal Reserve General Counsel Scott Alvarez said at an American Bar Association conference in Washington.

All that was left was for the provision to survive the horse trading between House and Senate appropriators during final budget talks.

During these negotiations with House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), his Senate counterpart, agreed to keep the provision in exchange for more funding for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to aides.\

Officials at both agencies have complained they are woefully underfunded and it is compromising their ability to carry out their Dodd-Frank responsibilities and to effectively police financial markets.

The fiscal 2015 spending package would increase the CFTC budget by $35 million to $250 million and the SEC’s budget by $150 million to $1.5 billion.