Let’s talk about what that caucus platform tells us…..

Published: April 19, 2021

 

Transcript:

well howdy there internet people it’s
beau again
so today we’re going to talk about that
would-be caucus
that may or may not happen in the future
now it’s kind of up in the air
and what it means because there’s a lot
of people
who want to dismiss it
take it as a joke or just
say that it’s not that important because
oh it’s just
that group of people and that’s just the
way they are and all of that stuff
i’m going to suggest that’s a really bad
idea
i’m going to suggest that’s very unwise
if you don’t know what i’m talking about
green to hear her tell it had a
document that was leaked by her staffers
it wasn’t ready yet
wasn’t ready to go out to the public and
maybe she hadn’t even read it and maybe
it was developed by you know some
outside group and she
she just didn’t even know sure let’s
pretend we believe that for a moment
that’s worse that’s worse
if it had just been her sure she’s the
space laser lady
kind of grown to expect it from her but
the idea that it’s some outside group
that’s willing to put out a document
like that that has the ear of people in
congress
oh that’s a concern i want to know who
that group is
i want to know who else in congress they
talked to
that didn’t answer any questions it
created more
and their concerning ones the other
concern
is the deafening silence that came from
the republican party once that platform
surfaced
just a bunch of overt racist garbage and
the overwhelming majority said nothing
her colleagues
they said nothing sure you had some
in the leadership step forward and say
oh this isn’t us we’re the party of
lincoln or
whatever but most were dead
quiet because
what that tells me is that
had it been received well had it been
politically advantageous
for them to be okay with it they would
have been
if they thought it helped their career
that’s a concern
you know before the election i said my
biggest fear
was that biden wins but not in a
landslide
he doesn’t win big enough to send the
message
that trumpism isn’t uh politically
tenable
it’s not a winning strategy that didn’t
happen he didn’t win
big not by big enough numbers to send
that message
and then the other part of the fear was
that because he won
people would think it was over this
document shows it’s not
my big concern was that all that
happened
and then the next person who picked up
the mantle of trumpism
would be smart they wouldn’t
broadcast every move on twitter
they’d be effective i want to know who
this group is
it’s the same stuff could be lifted from
any of the most horrible groups
throughout history
because it’s the same strategy you take
the majority
you get them kicking down at some group
that you can easily marginalize
and that motivates that base the thing
is
once that group gets in power
the people using that strategy that
majority
that they energize that base they’re
gonna demand
that those in power do something
about that scapegoated group
and that’s when really horrible things
happen
i would suggest that dismissing this
as the space laser lady
that’s uh that’s a bad idea we do that
at our own peril
you can be outraged at the content you
should be
but you should also take it as a warning
that you have to stay politically active
because those who want that brand of
authoritarianism
they are still out there and apparently
they have the year of people in congress
anyway it’s just a thought y’all have a
good day

How the Republican Party Could Break

After the Capitol Hill riot, the divide between reality and fantasy may become too wide to bridge.

For a long time, people have predicted the crackup of American conservatism, the end of a Republican Party dominated by the conservative movement as one of the major powers in our politics. Demographic trends were supposed to permanently marginalize the right. Barack Obama’s 2008 victory was supposed to signal conservatism’s eclipse. The rise of Donald Trump was supposed to shatter Republican politics the way that slavery once broke the Whigs.

Conservatism survived all these prophecies, always clawing back to claim a share of power, maintaining unity and loyalty by offering a bulwark against liberal ambition even as its own agenda became more and more threadbare.

So it would be a foolhardy prophet indeed who looked at the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol and assumed that this time, under this pressure, the conservative coalition will finally break apart, sending the Republican Party deep into the wilderness and reshaping American ideological debates along new lines.

But breaking points do come, and the violent endgame of the Trump presidency has exposed a new divide in the conservative coalition — not a normal ideological division or an argument about strategy or tactics, but a split between reality and fantasy that may be uniquely hard for either self-interest or statesmanship to bridge.

At the same time, it has cast the key weakness of conservatism into even sharper relief: the growing distance between right-wing politics and almost every nonpolitical power center in America, from the media and culture industries to the old-line corporate suites to the communications empires of Silicon Valley.

But the implicit bargain of the Trump era required traditional Republicans — from upper-middle-class suburbanites to the elites of the Federalist Society — to live with a lot of craziness from their leader, and a lot of even crazier ideas from the very-online portions of his base, in return for denying Democrats the White House. And it’s not clear that this bargain can survive the irruption of all that crazy into the halls of the Capitol, and the QAnon-ification of the right that made the riot possible.

Even before Jan. 6, the difficulty of balancing normal Republican politics with an insistence that Mike Pence could magically overturn a clear election outcome helped cost the party two Senate seats in Georgia. Even before the riot, finding post-Trump leaders who could bridge the internal divide, bringing along his base but also broadening the party, was going to be an extraordinary challenge.

But the Republican Party that lost Georgia a week ago still looked competitive enough to count on holding, say, 47 Senate seats even in a tough election cycle. A week later, it seems the party could easily break harder, and fall further.

Here’s how it could happen. First, the party’s non-Trumpist faction — embodied by senators like Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski, various purple- and blue-state governors and most of the remaining Acela corridor conservatives, from lawyers and judges to lobbyists and staffers — pushes for a full repudiation of Trump and all his works, extending beyond impeachment to encompass support for social-media bans, F.B.I. surveillance of the MAGA universe and more.

At the same time, precisely those measures further radicalize portions of the party’s base, offering apparent proof that Trump was right — that the system isn’t merely consolidating against but actively persecuting them. With this sense of persecution in the background and the Trump family posturing as party leaders, the voter-fraud mythology becomes a litmus test in many congressional elections, and baroque conspiracy theories pervade primary campaigns.

In this scenario, what remains of the center-right suburban vote and the G.O.P. establishment becomes at least as NeverTrump as Romney, if not the Lincoln Project; meanwhile, the core of Trump’s support becomes as paranoid as Q devotees. Maybe this leads to more empty acts of violence, further radicalizing the center right against the right, or maybe it just leads to Republican primaries producing a lot more candidates like Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, to the point where a big chunk of the House G.O.P. occupies not just a different tactical reality from the party’s elite but a completely different universe.

Either way, under these conditions that party could really collapse or really break. The collapse would happen if Trumpists with a dolchstoss narrative and a strong Q vibe start winning nominations for Senate seats and governorships in states that right now only lean Republican. A party made insane and radioactive by conspiracy theories could keep on winning deep-red districts, but if its corporate support bailed, its remaining technocrats jumped ship and suburban professionals regarded it as the party of insurrection, it could easily become a consistent loser in 30 states or more.

Alternatively, a party dominated by the Trump family at the grassroots level, with Greene-like figures as its foot soldiers, could become genuinely untenable as a home for centrist and non-Trumpist politicians. So after the renomination of Trump himself or the nomination of Don Jr. in 2024, a cluster of figures (senators like Romney and Susan Collins, blue-state governors like Maryland’s Larry Hogan) might simply jump ship to form an independent mini-party, leaving the G.O.P. as a 35 percent proposition, a heartland rump.

None of this is a prediction. In American politics, reversion to the gridlocked mean has been a safe bet for many years — in which case you’d expect the MAGA extremes to return to their fantasy world, the threat of violence to ebb, Trump to fade without his Twitter feed and the combination of Biden-administration liberalism and Big Tech overreach to bring the right’s blocking coalition back together in time for 2022.

But if Biden governs carefully, if Trump doesn’t go quietly, if MAGA fantasies become right-wing orthodoxies, then the stresses on the Republican Party and conservatism could become too great to bear.

I woke up last Wednesday thinking that the G.O.P. had survived the Trump era, its power reduced but relatively stable, with some faint chance to redeem itself — by carefully shepherding it supporters back toward reality, while integrating elements of populism into the reality-based conservatism that our misgoverned country needs.

A week later, that hope seems like as much of a fantasy as QAnon. Instead, it feels as if the Republican Party survived Trump’s presidency, but maybe not his disastrous and deadly leaving of it.