How Does Violence Corrupt the Soul? Ask Chat GPT.

See how AI’s answers put our human leaders to shame: “How Does Violence Corrupt the Soul?”

How Does Violence Corrupt the Soul? Ask Chat GPT. (I literally mean it.)


>> How does violence corrupt the soul?

(I added formatting)

Chat GPT answer:

Violence can have profound and lasting effects on both the victim and the perpetrator. It can lead to a corruption of the soul, in the sense that it can erode the moral and ethical fabric of an individual, leading to a degradation of empathy, compassion, and humanity. Here are some ways in which violence can corrupt the soul:

1) Desensitization:

Experiencing or perpetrating violence can desensitize individuals to the suffering of others. Over time, this desensitization can lead to a diminished capacity for empathy and an increased tolerance for cruelty.

2) Cycle of Violence:

Perpetrators of violence often become trapped in a cycle of aggression and retaliation, leading to a mindset that justifies further violence as a means of resolving conflicts. This cycle can perpetuate a distorted worldview that sees violence as a necessary and acceptable means of achieving goals or resolving disputes.

3) Guilt and Shame:

Individuals who have committed acts of violence may experience overwhelming feelings of guilt and shame, which can lead to a sense of self-loathing and a loss of self-worth. This can further perpetuate a cycle of violence as a way to cope with these negative emotions.

4) Loss of Trust and Connection:

Engaging in violent behavior can lead to the breakdown of trust and relationships with others. This isolation can deepen the sense of alienation and contribute to a lack of meaningful connections with others, exacerbating the feeling of spiritual corruption.

5) Distorted Moral Compass:

Violence can distort an individual’s moral compass, leading them to justify or rationalize harmful behavior. This can lead to a loss of integrity and moral values, causing individuals to prioritize personal gain and power over the well-being of others.

6) Trauma and Psychological Impact: 

Victims of violence can suffer from long-lasting psychological trauma, which can lead to feelings of helplessness, fear, and distrust. This can result in a distorted worldview, where the individual may perceive the world as inherently hostile and unsafe, leading to further emotional and psychological distress.

Overall, the experience and perpetration of violence can have devastating consequences for the individual’s spiritual and psychological well-being, causing them to become detached from their sense of humanity and moral principles. It is important to address and prevent violence in all its forms to safeguard the well-being of individuals and communities.

[Read more…]

Ta-Nehisi Coates: How Segregation and Violence Corrupt the Soul

Ta-Nehisi Coats gave an interview with Democracy Now! on November 2, 2023.

  • Coats understands the anger that comes from a people that are oppressed and feel abandoned by the rest of the world
  • But Coats says he’s starting to understand the importance of nonviolence because violence corrupts the soul

I’ve highlighted parts of the transcript to make it quicker to digest:

[Read more…]

MICIMATT Lyrics Suggestions

I’d like to get suggestions to my Monster Mash song.

The most important lines remaining are the ending, although I’d be happy to get improvements to the rest of the song.

Old: [Outro (with Pickett providing Igor vocals)]

(Wa-ooh) Ugh, mash good! (monster mash!)
(Wa-ooh) Easy, Igor, you impetuous young boy (monster mash!)
(Wa-ooh) Argh, mash good! Grrr!(monster mash!)
(Wa-ooh, monster mash!)

New?

(Wa-ooh) Ugh, mash good! (monster mash!)
(Wa-ooh) Easy, Sam, you exceptional young boy (monster mash!)
(Wa-ooh) Argh, mash good! Grrr!(monster mash!)
(Wa-ooh, monster mash!)

(Video: Ending)

MICIMATT Context:

There was a Green Party Presentation (slides) about the MICIMATT that said:

The ideology of MICIMATT is Liberal Hegemony — the aggressive propagation of democracy and free market economics

Employs militaristic foreign policy to impose U.S. liberal hegemony on the world
  • Circulatory System = money
  • Nervous system = influence
  • Pathology = militaristic policy
The MICIMATT (blob) dominates Washington policy and has overwhelming financial, political,, and media resources compared to peace activists
  • Phase 1 rationale: Anti-Communism
  • Phase 2 rationale: Anti-Terrorism
    Phase 3 rationale: Anti-Authoritarianism
What is U.S. Liberal Hegemony?
  • US is an exceptional nation
  • US has a historic duty to impose its political and economic model on the nations of the world
    • “Democratic” government (plutocracy)
    • “Free-market” economy (corporatocracy)
    • U.S. military supremacy needed to maintain order
    • U.S. “rules” supersede international law

In short: America’s elite control the world

 

MICIMATT’s greatest hits:

  • Afghanistan
  • Iraq
  • Libya
  • Syria
  • Ukraine

David Hay: Restarting Quantiative Easing (Grant Williams Transcript)

 

September 10, 2023

Joining me on the latest episode of The Grant Williams Podcast is my great friend, David Hay, Co-CIO of Evergreen GaveKal and the author of the excellent Substack Haymaker.

 

David Hay:

To your point, that’s a great point, and I didn’t want to forget that, so I’m glad you brought that up, is that you can actually own Newmont Mining, which has been crushed for a variety of reasons. Some companies specific, they’ve shot themselves in the foot a bit, but it’s got a 4% dividend yield. So if you want to get a 4% yield rather than buy a 10-year treasury, which pays barely over that, I think Newmont Gold, Newmont Mining is way more attractive at this point. If you and I are right, and I think we both believe that the only plausible end game for the federal government, the US government is to basically get back to QE. QE six, maybe it would be at this point. Restart their magical money machine. And by the way I don’t think Jay Powell will be there for that.

So I’ve got a few renegade predictions. One is that we’re going to see rising interest rates and a rising oil prices and a recession. But I also think we’re going to see Jay Powell resign before… he just won’t go along with another QE. And I think he will then pass the baton to a more politically compliant individual. And at that point they will get back to doing QE. I just don’t see how they’ll avoid it. Now, they’ll try to delay it, they’ll try all kinds of other tricks before they get there. And if we’re right about that, and maybe I’m putting words in your mouth, you can correct me if you disagree with that. But if that is the ultimate outcome, I don’t see how gold doesn’t just go absolutely ballistic.

Grant Williams:

I’m surprised it hasn’t done that already, as anybody listening to me will probably know by now. Let me dig into that comment about Jay Powell because I find that really interesting. The impetus for QE has always and consistently come from within the Federal Reserve. So I’m curious as to why you think he might resign rather than go along with it. Where is the call going to come from for QE? Is it going to become a political issue rather than a central banking issue? And so, how does that transmission mechanism work?

David Hay:

Yes, I think there’s going to be tremendous pressure from say Congress and maybe even within the Fed itself to monetize. And I do have to give Jay Powell credit and my book Bubble 3.0, I wish actually was published in very early 2022. I was very critical of Jay Powell Powell and I think deservedly so. I think when he publishes his memoirs, he’d probably admit that one of his greatest mistakes was to assume that inflation was transitory in 2021. But I have to give him credit that I would’ve assumed under the severe market stress that we saw last year, which was the worst year for balanced portfolios since 1871. So you got killed in stocks, you got killed in bonds, at least longer term bonds. You would’ve thought that the old Jay Powell would’ve folded like cheap lawn furniture, and gotten back into his easy money mode, the big easy, but he didn’t.

He stuck to his guns. He’s continued to stick to his guns and found out that unlike 2018, that if he did that the world wouldn’t shake apart. So you got to give him credit. But I think he’s much more concerned about his legacy at this point than he is about being politically popular. But there’s sure a whole lot of people at the Fed that want to be politically popular. And I do think that’s one of the reasons why we are in a structural inflationary period is the politicization of the Fed that’s gone on. And he’s at this point kind of the lone opposer of that trend. But that’s why I think that he’s not long for this world, but I think it’ll be his choice. I don’t think he’ll be forced out, but I could be wrong about that. That’s a really extreme prediction, but I think it’s a different Jay Powell than we’ve had up until this time.

 

Read Original