“Debating the Trump Presidency” with Charles Kesler and Jonah Goldberg

“Debating the Trump Presidency” with

Public debate took place on October 12, 2018, at the University of Notre Dame.

Presented by the Constitutional Studies and Tocqueville Programs at Notre Dame and the Intercollegiate Studies Institute.

My Comments:

President Trump couldn’t have written that sentence about “prejudice”!

Charles Kesler makes the mistake of misattributing to Trump the words of the presidential speech-writers:  (Starting at 15:15 min)

In his inaugural address for example he said in a beautiful sentence: When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.

(But of course, it is highly unlikely that Trump wrote that sentence or would even be capable of writing that sentence.  One can tell that Trump’s speech writers wrote it because the voice of “Scripted Trump” sounds very different than RealDonaldTrump.)

Counter example: Has patriotism ever left room for prejudice historically?

To quibble with Trump’s speech writers a bit:
If one examines History, does one ever find patriotic men whose hearts left room for prejudice?
I can agree with the writers’ quote if one stipulates “true patriotism“, but I don’t feel as though Trump promotes “true patriotism”.  True patriotism:
  • Is Selfless
  • Is Humble
  • Abjures Divisiveness
  • Honors Civility and preserves government institutions that maintain it
  • Pursues the Common good
  • Is Motivated by high ideals, not power, bigotry, attention, or fame.
  • Pursues shared power, with checks and balances
  • Looks for win-win agreements
  • Respects boundaries and limits
  • Pursues Liberty and Justice for all
  • Wishes other countries well (does not demean them, as nationalist do)
  • Values dissent in the pursuit of a more perfect union

Is Donald Trump a self-reflective man?

Charles Kesler also imagines that Donald Trump is capable of serious self-reflection: (15:41 min)

I think that is the standard that he would repair to in his moments of most serious self-reflection.

From everything I’ve read, Donald Trump strikes me as someone who actively avoids serious self-reflection.  In an interview with a biographer, he said:

“No, I don’t want to think about it,” he said when Mr. D’Antonio asked him to contemplate the meaning of his life. “I don’t like to analyze myself because I might not like what I see.”

Imagining that Trump would engage in serious self-reflection about “prejudice” is only slightly less plausible than imagining that Trump maintains a prayer journal.

Kesler is deceiving himself with “IdealizedTrump”

In my view, Mr. Kesler is deceiving himself by imagining an IdealizedTrump who embodies those qualities he wishes to see in a President, rather than the RealDonaldTrump.  Even the semi-presidential tweets found on Trump’s twitter account are likely made by staff.  (how to tell)

 

 

Hillary Lacks Remorse of Conscience

Oddly, she seems completely sincere, as if she believes the alternative facts she’s peddling.

 She lost because the Democratic National Committee didn’t help her. “I inherit nothing from the Democratic Party. I mean it was bankrupt. . . . Its data was mediocre to poor, nonexistent, wrong. I had to inject money into it.”

.. She lost because she was “swimming against a historic tide. It’s very difficult historically to succeed a two-term president of your own party.” She lost because she was “the victim of a very broad assumption that I was going to win.” She lost because the news media ignored her policy positions.
.. It tells you something about our own power to hypnotize ourselves, to invent reasons that avoid the real reasons. It is a tribute to the power of human denial.
.. The truth is Bernie Sanders destroyed Mrs. Clinton’s chance of winning by almost knocking her off, and in the process revealing her party’s base had changed. Her plodding, charmless, insincere style of campaigning defeated her. Bad decisions in her campaign approach to the battleground states did it; a long history of personal scandals did it; fat Wall Street speeches did it; the Clinton Foundation’s bloat and chicanery did it—and most of all the sense that she ultimately stands for nothing but Hillary did it.
.. “when Clintonworld sources started telling us in 2015 that Hillary was still struggling to articulate her motivation for seeking the presidency.” Her campaign was “an unholy mess, fraught with tangled lines of authority . . . distorted priorities, and no sense of greater purpose.” “Hillary didn’t have a vision to articulate. And no one else could give one to her.” “Hillary had been running for president for almost a decade and still didn’t really have a rationale.”
.. Mrs. Clinton has shown herself to be largely incapable of honest self-reflection
.. People are always doing bad things to her, she never does bad things to them. They operate in bad faith, she only in good.
.. It is one thing to say, “I take responsibility,” and follow that up with a list of things you believe you got wrong. It’s another thing to say, “I take responsibility,” and then immediately pivot to arguments as to why other people are to blame. “I take responsibility for everything I got wrong, but that’s not why I lost,” is literally what she said Wednesday.