How would each MBTI type react to redundant and/or stupid rules?
ISTJ: Will thrive even if the rule is stupid
ISFJ: Will side with the group they are with. If the group hates the rules, they too will act like they also hate the rules
INFJ: might complain. will internally die.
INTJ: Redundant is okay. Stupid will be fought.
ISTP: I’m not sure if they even know the rules
ISFP: will begrudgingly follow
INFP: won’t care about stupid, but redundant will bother them. will follow, but complain.
INTP: even a good rule will be broken.
ESTP: threw out that memo with the rules
ESFP: will joke their way around the rule. end up in trouble. probably gets to be an exception to the rule.
ENFP: probably wouldn’t notice if it’s stupid. Redundancy would be okay too ish.
ENTP: grumbles. finds loopholes. makes a scene.
ESTJ: Made the rule. Enforces the rule. Is exempt from the rule.
ESFJ: Also enforces the rule.
ENFJ: works around the rule to make the most of it
ENTJ: secretly did not follow the rule.
The nerve agent poisoning in England was a message to the rest of the world
‘You won’t be safe anywhere, even if you’re in Britain’
The nerve agent attack on former Russian double-agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter sends a powerful message to the rest of the world: the assassins aren’t playing by the rules.
.. Still, if the Russian government really was responsible, why use a nerve agent that could so easily be traced back to them? “They’ve had plenty of opportunities to kill Skripal,” says Michael Kofman, an expert on Russian military affairs at the nonprofit research organization CNA. “And there are, frankly, a myriad of much simpler and more practical ways of doing it.”
But using chemical weapons is about more than just killing. These taboo weapons are instruments of terror, and their use is designed to send a message to the world: that the power behind the attack — Russia, according to the UK — doesn’t think anyone else is ruthless enough to retaliate effectively. And to others who might consider betraying Russia to foreign powers, it’s that snitches get more than stitches — they get murdered.
.. Using Novichok as a calling card could be a way of saying that Russia doesn’t care about looking guilty because whatever retaliation the UK and the West might muster isn’t frightening enough. After all, an in-kind response is off the table
.. If only one side is willing to be ruthless, it changes the rules of the game. This “etiquette of espionage,” for example, held that former spies were off limits for assassination attempts
.. And there’s an international treaty against using chemical weapons, so using them for assassination attempts on foreign soil are beyond the pale. “They do things like this intentionally to show that they in no way will be limited by what are considered to be established rules and norms of behavior,”
.. That message is also aimed at anyone considering telling Russia’s secrets to foreign powers, Kimmage says. “One very clear message is ‘If you betray us, we will kill you’ to put it into blunt, mafia-like terms,” he says. “‘You won’t be safe anywhere, even if you’re in Britain.’” The attempted murder of Sergei Skripal made an example out of him, and the theatrical method ensured that the press picked up the message and distributed it around the globe.
.. “The threat of chemical weapons not only endures in the 21st century, but is spreading.” In the last few years, the Assad regime unleashed chemical weapons on civilians in Syria; ISIS used mustard gas in Syria and Iraq; state-sponsored assassins used the nerve agent VX to kill Kim Jong-nam, Kim Jong-un’s half-brother. And now, a chemical weapon made for the battlefield was used in a UK cathedral town, in the attempted murder of a UK citizen.
Vestergaard writes: “It seems the chemical peace is not just broken; it is shattered.”