How US Aircraft Carriers Defend Themselves When Surrounded

 

In the 1990s a naval exercise was held between friendly NATO sea powers. During the first exercise a US carrier was sunk by a Dutch submarine without the escorting destroyers and aircraft ever finding or catching it. They simply ignored the outcome and restarted the exercise pretending it never happened. The Dutch submarine captain was berated for going outside of the script. Just saying..
I am wondering how all of the impressive vessels and weapons can combat the new enemy, climate change. We barely even realize we are being attacked. Insidious, slow motion asphyxiation.
the Swedish were able to “sink” an US carrier during exercise 2003, the France 2009 and the Italian 2013, all Nations were able to pass rough the defensiv “Shield” of the carrier fleet!!! that’s why the US has in 2020 chosen to buy an Italian*French frigate as their new ship against submarine and other hazards!!! but i always love this US propaganda machine, never mentioning any failure
0:25 good job hiding that environment friendly smoke
Things like this make me sleep good!!! God bless🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
All good and well, the Germans thought the BISMARK was unsinkable with its heavy steel plating and huge guns, they all have an Achilles heel. Hopefully this will never be tested. I always said aircraft carriers were floating ducks in the water due too their size and slow speed. God bless and protect all those who sail on her.
May God keep America the strong 💪💠🇺🇸🙏💐
 @Anthony Casso  I’m only speculating.. Missiles can travel many times the speed of sound, many times faster than jets. Yes, satellites will pick up a barrage of incoming missiles, and missiles can have many times the explosive power than the largest of cannons on ships, meaning that when they talk about all the bulkheads that can seal off compartments to keep a ship from sinking, a direct hit from a large missile, my guess, would do BIG damage period. Also missiles have their own radar etc. guidance systems as well as pre planned flight maneuvers,, they don’t have to come straight down at a ship, they can spiral, zig zag, whatever. Hard to lock onto with a rapid fire cannon especially when there are another 99 missiles coming in at the same time. The cost of 100 missiles is a fraction of the cost of one of these carriers. Not to mention stealth submarine technology. As mentioned before, satellites can chart the exact location of each and every carrier 24/7. Would not surprise me that for each super carrier we have there is a sub following it.
Isn’t the current naval doctrine of the US and allies at risk given China and Russia’s advances in anti-ship missile warfare, against which the west has little in the way of countermeasures?
Thank god for Uncle Sam. Respect from 🇬🇧
Nothing can inspire you early in the morning like this video. GOD BLESS united States of American for ever…..
Nothing is unsinkable. Japanese thought yamato was invincible.
The best defense is not to send them to combat or don’t start one and waste tax payer’s money!
Thank God I’m an American and we got these things to protect us. 🇺🇸 🦅
+Wild Iron This video is at the level of its outstanding contents. The highhest of the highest. The US is at sea, number one in front of China and Russia and the whole of Europe. A century would not be enough to China to level the US at sea. WONDERFUL, ASTONISHING, IMPRESSIVE AND MARVELLOUS EVERYTHING I SAW IN THIS VIDEO. CONGRATS TO ALL OF YOU WHO TOOK PART ON THIS PROJECT!
People forget that it only takes one nuke to sink a whole fleet
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16 KJV, Jesus Christ is the only way……….
Pride of The Department of War!
These ships, ships, planes, missiles are beautiful from a distance, but these are ambassadors of death, who knows how many children and innocents have been killed by these beautiful weapons? I hate every war and every weapon of war in the whole world, I dream of a world without war and bloodshed and without any weapons of war for humanity

CIA Propaganda SHUT DOWN By Journalist In Real Time | The Kyle Kulinski Show

00:00
matt lee is uh an associated press
00:04
foreign policy correspondent or state
00:06
department uh journalist and
00:09
he
00:11
really questioned this guy ned price the
00:13
state department spokesperson very
00:14
aggressively over this new claim that’s
00:16
emerged
00:17
that
00:18
we now know russia is planning a false
00:20
flag attack uh to invade ukraine and
00:25
you know therefore it’s like
00:28
basically whatever the us wants to do in
00:29
response is justified because we we
00:32
didn’t start it we didn’t do anything we
00:33
didn’t do anything wrong here and so if
00:36
we want to deploy troops to the border
00:38
tens of thousands of them if we want to
00:40
have the tanks ready to go
00:42
if we want to do sanctions not just of
00:44
the oligarchs but even russian civilians
00:46
hey don’t question us we’re telling you
00:49
we we know we have the smoking gun
00:50
evidence that they’re gonna do a false
00:52
flag attack and we need to be prepared
00:54
for that so this journalist has been
00:56
around the block
00:57
and he’s going to do a very simple thing
00:59
he’s going to ask for evidence and look
01:00
at how comical this back and forth is uh
01:03
we told you a few weeks ago that we have
01:05
information indicating russia also has
01:07
already pre-positioned a group of
01:09
operatives to conduct a false flag
01:11
operation in eastern ukraine so that map
01:13
to your question is an action that
01:15
russia has already taken it’s an action
01:17
that you say that they have taken but
01:19
you have shown no evidence to
01:22
to to confirm that and i’m going to get
01:24
to the next question here which is what
01:26
is the evidence that they i mean this is
01:28
like crisis actors really this is like
01:31
alex jones territory you’re getting it
01:32
too now
01:34
um what evidence do you have to support
01:36
the idea that there is some propaganda
01:39
film in the in in the making
01:41
now this is derived uh from information
01:44
known to the us government intelligence
01:46
information that we have declassified i
01:48
think okay well where is it where is
01:50
this information it is intelligence
01:52
information that we have declassified
01:54
well where is it where is the
01:55
declassified information i just
01:57
delivered it
01:59
look no you made a series of allegations
02:02
would you like us to print out the
02:03
topper because you will see a transcript
02:05
of this briefing that you can print out
02:06
for yourself it’s not evidence ned
02:08
that’s you saying it that’s not evidence
02:10
i’m sorry
02:13
what would you like matt
02:14
i i would like to see some proof that
02:16
you that that
02:18
that you can show
02:20
that
02:20
that matt
02:22
that shows that that that shows that the
02:24
russians are doing this ned i’ve been
02:26
doing this i know that was my passion
02:29
you have been doing this for quite a
02:30
while you know that when we declassify
02:31
intelligence information we do so in a
02:34
means
02:43
where is the declassified information
02:45
other than you coming out here and
02:47
saying
02:48
matt i’m sorry you don’t like the format
02:50
uh but we have
02:51
format it’s the content i’m sorry you
02:53
don’t like the content i’m sorry you i’m
02:56
sorry you are doubting the information
02:57
that is in the possession of the us
02:59
government
03:00
what i’m telling you is that this is
03:01
information that’s available to us we
03:03
are making it available to you uh in
03:05
order uh for a couple reasons one is to
03:08
attempt to deter the russians from going
03:10
ahead with this activity two in the
03:12
event we’re not able to do that in the
03:14
event the russians do go ahead with us
03:16
to make it clear as day to lay bear the
03:18
fact that this has always been an
03:20
attempt on the part of the russian
03:21
federation to fabricate a pretext
03:25
yeah but you don’t have any
03:28
any evidence to back it up other than
03:30
what you’re saying
03:31
it’s like you’re saying
03:32
we think we we have
03:34
information the russians may do this
03:37
but you won’t tell us what the
03:39
information is and then when when you’re
03:41
that is the idea behind deterrence that
03:43
is
03:59
moving forward with this type of
04:00
activity that is why we’re making it
04:02
public today if the russians don’t go
04:04
forward with this that is not uh ipso
04:07
facto an indication that they never had
04:08
plans to do so uh but then it’s
04:11
unprovable
04:12
my god what is the evidence that you
04:14
have that suggests that that the
04:16
russians are even planning this i mean
04:17
i’m not saying that they’re not but you
04:19
just come out and say this and expect us
04:21
just to to believe it without you
04:24
showing a shred of evidence that it’s
04:26
actually true other than
04:28
when i ask or what anyone else asks
04:30
what’s the information you said well i
04:32
just gave it to you which was just you
04:34
making a statement matt you said
04:35
yourself you’ve been in this business
04:36
for quite a long time you know that when
04:38
we make information uh intelligence
04:40
information public we do so uh in a way
04:43
that protects sensitive sources and
04:45
methods you also know that we do so we
04:49
declassify information only when we’re
04:51
confident in that information if you
04:53
doubt if you doubt the the credibility
04:55
of the us government of the british
04:57
government uh of other governments and
04:58
want to uh
05:00
you know find uh solace and information
05:02
that uh the russians are putting out uh
05:04
that is that is for you to do so in
05:07
other words you are a russian
05:09
propagandist or a russian stooge or a
05:12
dupe
05:13
um
05:14
or a foreign asset
05:16
because you’re trusting them over us
05:18
when all he’s doing is saying i’m
05:20
agnostic i just want to see your
05:21
evidence if you’re gonna make a claim
05:23
the burden is on you to provide the
05:24
evidence that’s how it works that’s how
05:26
it’s supposed to work but usually the
05:29
rest of the media when they’re state
05:30
department sources or their cia sources
05:32
uh tell them something they’re
05:34
stenographers they take it at face value
05:37
because they’re suckers who are putting
05:39
these positions specifically for that
05:41
reason i’m surprised this ap guy hasn’t
05:43
been fired already because there’s a
05:44
number of times he’s held this slimy
05:47
weasel
05:48
ned price accountable
05:50
and he’s so bad at the job he’s so
05:52
terrible at this he’s like we know that
05:54
the russians are are now doing this
05:56
what’s your evidence i just told you
05:58
that we know that that they’re gonna be
06:00
doing this that’s not evidence that’s
06:02
not evidence now understand something
06:04
just like ned says i’ll say the same
06:05
thing
06:06
i don’t know is it possible that they’re
06:08
going to do that sure
06:09
but this is not an agency that has a
06:12
track record of truth telling in fact
06:14
quite the opposite they have a long
06:16
record of lying about everything
06:18
these are the same people that got us
06:20
into the iraq war now i’m sure some
06:21
people involved in the stuff behind the
06:23
scenes maybe really believe the [ __ ]
06:25
really believe the line of argument and
06:26
so they were acting in good faith even
06:29
though they were wrong but there’s also
06:30
people who might not be who might not be
06:32
acting in good faith who are lying and
06:34
know that they’re lying
06:36
but at the end of the day all that
06:37
matters is whether or not what they’re
06:39
saying is true and what that means we
06:40
should do about it now look i’m on
06:43
record are there certain things that are
06:45
on the table in a negotiation with
06:46
russia that are more like hardline
06:48
approaches absolutely absolutely so for
06:52
one thing
06:53
um the nordstrom 2 pipeline should the
06:55
u.s use that as leverage sure absolutely
06:58
in other words look if we find some sort
07:00
of peace agreement and a way out of this
07:01
then you can have the north stream two
07:03
pipeline if you don’t we’re gonna
07:05
undercut it not let you have it and the
07:07
u.s will sell our natural gas to germany
07:09
and we’ll sell the same price as you
07:10
guys even if it’s at a loss
07:12
that’s one thing you could put on the
07:13
table another thing is uh like it or not
07:16
these nations are sovereign nations that
07:18
were the post-soviet states so
07:22
having them armed so they could defend
07:24
themselves yeah that’s absolutely on the
07:26
table that makes perfect sense they’re
07:27
sovereign nations they get to do that if
07:29
they want to do that now these are
07:30
things that all these things russia
07:32
views as red lines that you can’t do
07:36
no
07:37
don’t agree and that’s the whole point
07:38
of a negotiation now are there other
07:41
parts of the deal that would be
07:42
concessions to russia well yes because
07:43
again that’s part of a negotiation as
07:45
well
07:46
and so
07:47
uh i want peace i want to avoid world
07:49
war iii
07:50
so
07:51
um does that mean we’re not gonna do war
07:53
games on russia’s border anymore with
07:55
nato yes does that mean we’re not gonna
07:56
have missiles pointed directly at russia
07:58
in in an ally state of ours yes
08:01
does that mean that you know uh nato
08:04
should not move an inch closer to
08:05
russia’s border absolutely all those
08:07
things are true but it’s also true that
08:09
other things are on the table but
08:11
what the us government is trying to do
08:12
is lay the groundwork and set the
08:14
preconditions to allow us to do anything
08:18
and play the victim and
08:20
play like we’re acting defensive every
08:21
step of the way but it is the same
08:23
organization that led us into the iraq
08:25
war you know the state department the
08:26
cia if these are the same outlets that
08:28
lied about russiagate relentlessly for
08:30
years straight and they are
08:32
well then you shouldn’t take their word
08:33
for it they need to actually show
08:34
evidence if they have such evidence
08:36
they’re not showing the evidence which
08:37
means they don’t have such evidence
08:38
again that’s not to say it’s impossible
08:40
that russia would do this but you need
08:43
to prove it you need to show it you
08:45
absolutely need to show it and so this
08:46
is a rare instance of a journalist doing
08:48
their job doing their job right
08:51
doing their job effectively and really
08:53
unmasking
08:54
the the little weasel state department
08:56
spokesperson here
08:59
so
09:02
there you have it i really hope that the
09:04
negotiation works and we can find a way
09:06
to back out of this feud because
09:10
in the nuclear age with two
09:11
nuclear-armed states you don’t even want
09:13
to be this close
09:15
to some sort of
09:17
fight
09:19
you don’t
09:20
it’s for the future of humanity it’s a
09:23
necessity that you find a way
09:25
out of this situation
09:27
and you need to use all the negotiation
09:29
skills all the diplomacy in the world
09:31
and you need to be fair-minded and
09:32
reasonable and unfortunately i do not
09:35
trust the us at all to do that i don’t
09:37
really trust russia either
09:39
but i also
09:41
know
09:42
that our government has lied
09:43
relentlessly
09:45
about this stuff and
09:47
finally somebody’s holding them
09:48
accountable if you want to see me and
09:50
crystal ball interview legends like noam
09:52
chomsky cornell west and more subscribe
09:54
to crystal kyle and friends on sub stack
09:56
five dollars a month get you the video
09:58
version a day early remember we take
10:01
zero ad dollars for this podcast or you
10:03
can sign up on sub stack for free and
10:05
get the audio version a day later link
10:07
in the video description box below

24: Jack Bauer and the Bush Administration’s 911 Terror Fantasy

“24” was the Bush administration’s favorite TV show. It was also a quasi-apocalyptic nightmare that reduced America to a cathedral of death worship. That is not coincidental. This is the seventh episode of Pretty Good, a show about stories that are pretty good.

Jake Tapper’s Israel Coverage Is A JOKE

The premise of Jake Tapper’s question to Rep. Pramila Jayapal is dead wrong according to just about every other news outlet. Ana Kasparian discusses on The Young Turks. Watch LIVE weekdays 6-8 pm ET. http://youtube.com/tyt/live