The Russia scandal is about more than collusion. It’s also about the corruption of America’s elites.
As seemingly every national political figure not already hopelessly in the tank for President Trump rushed Monday to denounce his disastrous press conference with Russian despot Vladimir Putin, few condemnations received as much attention as this one from former CIA Director John Brennan:
Donald Trump’s press conference performance in Helsinki rises to & exceeds the threshold of “high crimes & misdemeanors.” It was nothing short of treasonous. Not only were Trump’s comments imbecilic, he is wholly in the pocket of Putin. Republican Patriots: Where are you???133K people are talking about this
I don’t know why Trump and his team accepted, and at times actively solicited, the help of Putin and Russian intelligence in winning the 2016 election, and why they have appeared at times to actively serve Putin’s interests once in office. Maybe they were just taking whatever help they could get; maybe the pee tape is real; maybe Jon Chait’s theory is right and Trump has been a Soviet/Russian asset for three decades.
But I think I know why Trump thought it was okay to do what he did — why he could get away with it. The reason is a culture of elite impunity, where business and political leaders face absolutely no accountability for misdeeds. And it’s a culture that Brennan and many political elites like him have fostered, and from which they have personally benefited.
It’s much bigger than collusion. It encompasses many decades during which political officials have evaded accountability for broken laws and illicit foreign contacts, and business and corporate elites have skirted punishment for outright fraud. It’s a problem that, ironically, Trump hammered home in the campaign: that there’s a different set of rules for elites than for normal people. It just happens that Trump knows that because he, for decades now, has been taking advantage of elite impunity.
And unless critics are willing to target the problem of impunity, a problem in which some of them may be implicated, stuff like the Russia scandal will just keep happening, again and again.
The culture of impunity
We don’t punish white-collar criminals in this country. Not really, and certainly not by comparison to how we punish poorer, less white people for less severe offenses.
Only one Wall Street executive ever served jail time for the financial crisis. Rampant foreclosure fraud during the crisis, in which mortgage companies illegally forced millions of families from their homes on the basis of false evidence, went largely unpunished. Lanny Breuer, President Obama’s assistant attorney general for the criminal division of the Department of Justice, was so notoriously lax that Obama’s White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler once jokingly asked him, “How many cases are you dismissing this week?”
And no one knows how easy it is to get away with complicated financial crimes better than Donald Trump. For decades, he was able to dodge any consequences for his routine collaborations with the Mafia, even though his relationship with (to give just one example among many) the mob-linked union official John Cody prompted the FBI to subpoena Trump. His real estate businesses are routinely entangled with corrupt officials abroad, with the Trump International Hotel and Tower Baku in Azerbaijan and the Trump office towers in India looking particularly fishy. (Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, even unknowingly profiting from corrupt activities in a foreign country is a federal crime.)
And the people around him have similarly checkered histories. His longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen is, of course, currently under federal investigation from the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and has been linked to various insurance fraud schemes, including one involving recent Russian immigrants falsely claiming they were hit by cars. Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. were nearly charged with fraud for their conduct in marketing the Trump SoHo hotel and condo development in 2012.
Jared Kushner is facing lawsuits for his role as a slumlord in the Baltimore area and for overcharging rent from his New York City tenants; we know that his company falsified rent control paperwork in New York. Kushner stands out among Trump’s associates in that his father is the rare person actually prosecuted for and convicted of serious financial crimes, which doesn’t seem to have made the younger Kushner any more cautious. If anything, it appears to have made him more committed to the family trade.
Donald Trump, Ivanka, Don Jr., Cohen, and Kushner aren’t under criminal indictment just yet. (Of course, Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, is, and for serious financial crimes that are so far largely unrelated to his work for Trump.) Maybe it’s all just a series of awful coincidences. Or maybe they have correctly perceived that you can get away with truly massive white-collar crimes, and have lived their lives accordingly.
Political crimes are basically never punished, even with a body count
This same culture exists, perhaps to an even greater degree, for political wrongdoing. The Russia scandal should have, but largely hasn’t, reminded us that a presidential candidate has collaborated with a foreign government against the American government before, and gotten away with it.
In the summer of 1968, as biographer John A. Farrell has demonstrated, Republican nominee Richard Nixon and his aides actively sabotaged efforts by Lyndon Johnson’s administration to negotiate an end to the Vietnam War. They got away with it, prolonging a war that wound up killing more than a million people in the process. It’s barely even on the list of Nixonian wrongdoing that people remember. Henry Kissinger was at the time a Johnson adviser leaking information for Nixon to use in his efforts. Today he remains a broadly respected elder statesman, even in Democratic administrations.
It wasn’t even two decades later that the next Republican administration conspired with a foreign government, namely Iran’s. This time, the actions weren’t just horrendously immoral but illegal as well; elongating the Vietnam War was, alas, not a crime, but funding the Contras with Iranian arms deal money was. So was lying to Congress about it. Fourteen members of Reagan’s administration were indicted, and 11 were convicted.
It didn’t matter. Before leaving office, President George H.W. Bush pardoned six people involved, all high-ranking policy officials like Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane, Assistant Secretary of State Elliott Abrams, and CIA covert ops director Clair George. National Security Council official Oliver North and National Security Adviser John Poindexter had, at that point, already gotten their convictions tossed out, not because they were innocent but due to a complication resulting from Congress giving them immunity to testify.
Lawrence Walsh, appointed independent counsel to investigate Iran-Contra, would later write, “What set Iran-Contra apart from previous political scandals was the fact that a cover-up engineered in the White House of one president and completed by his successor prevented the rule of law from being applied to the perpetrators of criminal activity of constitutional dimension.”
And because the rule of law wasn’t applied, many of the perpetrators remain members in good standing of Washington’s foreign policy establishment. Poindexter returned to government to run the George W. Bush administration’s Information Awareness Office and “Total Information Awareness” program, leaving after a public controversy around a betting market he wanted to create where bettors would’ve profited if a terrorist strike occurred. Abrams, whose far worse transgressions in the Reagan years involved his support for El Salvador’s brutal military dictatorship and his efforts to cover up the El Mozote massacre, worked as a senior National Security Council official for the entirety of the George W. Bush administration.
In that administration, of course, dozens of policymakers collaborated to systematically violate US and international law forbidding torture. While low-ranking Army soldiers and officers were court-martialed in certain cases, like Abu Ghraib, the people ultimately responsible for the policy regime got away with it. John Yoo and Jay Bybee, who put together memos authorizing systematic torture of detainees without trial, escaped all prosecution. Yoo is a tenured professor at UC Berkeley. Bybee is a federal judge with life tenure.
The Obama administration not only declined to prosecute CIA officials who tortured detainees in accordance with the torture memos but failed to prosecute them even in numerous cases where those guidelines were exceeded. As Vox’s Andrew Prokop explained in 2014, the Justice Department didn’t even bother to bring charges in the cases of Gul Rahman and Manadel al-Jamadi, who were literally tortured to death.
Nor did they bring any charges against Jose Rodriguez, who authorized the destruction of 92 tapes showing the CIA torturing detainees, or against anyone who assisted Rodriguez. Gina Haspel, who Rodriguez has said drafted the order to destroy the tapes, and who ran a CIA black site for torture in Thailand, is now the director of the CIA.
Impunity means we will only get more wrongdoing
With that history — with such a clear record that neither businesspeople engaged in systematic financial wrongdoing nor political officials involved in criminal activity and illicit deals with foreign powers will ever face any consequences — why on earth wouldn’t someone like Trump, a man who lacks any willingness to sacrifice his self-interest in order to do the right thing, work with Russia? Why wouldn’t he feel okay asking Russia to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails? Why would Donald Trump Jr. have any reservations at all about accepting help from the Russian government, declaring, “If it’s what you say I love it”? People like them, in their shoes, have done the same or worse before and gotten away with it. Kissinger even got a Nobel Prize.
The obvious rebuttal here is that the Trumps are different. They’re distinctly immoral, uniquely willing to fly in the face of decency and patriotic duty and basic morality to make money and gain power. They don’t need a culture of impunity to do horrible things. To which I’d respond: yes, obviously. That’s who they are. But there will always be people like that, and there will be more as long as we maintain a system that gives them total immunity from criminal or even professional consequences for their actions.
Donald Trump Jr. himself, in his typical “say the loud part quiet and the quiet part loud” way, laid all this out pretty clearly in an interview with the Senate Judiciary Committee. “What about the thing that says, ‘It is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,’” Heather Sawyer, a Democratic counsel for the committee, asked him. “Did you also love that?”
“I don’t know,” Donald Jr. replied. “I don’t recall.”
“Did you understand that that would be problematic?” Sawyer pressed. Trump answered: “I didn’t think that listening to someone with information relevant to the fitness and character of a presidential candidate would be an issue, no.”
Donald Jr. was coached meticulously before that hearing, so it’s hard to read too much into what he’s saying. But I believe him. I believe he genuinely didn’t think that collaborating with the Russian government to get his father elected would be an issue.
That’s what impunity means: It means not thinking that grievous wrongdoing will one day be an issue. It helps explain why even decorated civil servants like John Brennan at best remained silent about, and at worst participated in, the CIA’s torture regime. It wasn’t an issue for him, ultimately; he eventually became director, where he could defend torturers at greater length.
But that’s exactly the problem. It should be an issue. We’ve set up a system where the baseline assumption is that nothing short of, I don’t know, full-on in-person murder can disqualify an elite political or business figure from their posting. And that means that people like the Trumps will continue to believe that criminality and collusion are just fine. Unless we’re willing to break down that system, and interrogate the role that even Trump’s enemies have played in building it, we will get two, three, many Trumps in the future.
Correction: I initially wrote that Jon Chait believes Trump has been an Russian “agent” for three decades. In fact, Chait believes that Trump “might” have been a Russian “asset” for three decades. I regret the error.
Trump forgot that his family is a bunch of slumlords. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. MORE TYT: https://tyt.com/trial
Read more here: https://www.newsweek.com/trump-critic… “Critics of President Donald Trump responded to his recent labeling of Elijah Cummings’ congressional district in Maryland as “disgusting” and “rodent infested” with photos of neighborhoods in Republican-controlled districts that also appeared to be rife with homelessness, poverty and waste.
Trump on Saturday railed against Cummings and Baltimore — about half of which falls in the congressman’s district — calling the city “disgusting rat and rodent infested.” Rather than decry or disavow the president’s remarks, Trump’s allies and conservative media outlets like Fox News attempted to bolster his claim by sharing photos and video of destitute and dirty portions of the Maryland metropolis. White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday he’d have been “fired” from running his former South Carolina congressional district if it had as much crime and homelessness.
But Trump critics began pointing out these images were cherry-picked and failed to tell the whole story of Baltimore or the many suburban and rural communities included in Cummings’ district, they also posted pictures of their own of neighborhoods blighted by poverty and crime.
What’s more, these photos were reportedly taken in congressional districts and states controlled by staunch Republican Trump defenders, including Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Rep. Devin Nunes’ district in California’s San Joaquin Valley and Fresno.”
Jared Kushner’s corruption is following him everywhere.
Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senioradviser Jared Kushner he did a lot ofdefending the president on a lot ofdifferent topics on an interview withAxios on HBO so let’s get right into itbecause I want to show you what happenedwhen Kushner is asked whether he hasseen Trump do anything racist or bigotedtake a look so for the answer is noabsolutely notyou can’t not be a racist for 69 yearsthen run for president be a racist andwhat I’ll say is that when a lot of theDemocrats call the president a racist Ithink they’re doing a disservice topeople who suffer because of real racismin this country I’m so imagine you havethe same reaction everyone else didwatching that luckily Jonathan Swan theinterviewer in this he had a pretty goodfollow-up take a look was birtherismracist um look I wasn’t really involvedin that I know you wouldn’t mm-hmm wasit racist like I said I wasn’t involvedin that I know you won mm-hmm was itracist um look I know who the presidentis and I have not seen anything in himthat is racist so again I was notinvolved in that did you wish he didn’tdo that like I said I was not involvedin that that was a long time ago allright so that’s his answer to thefollow-up I forget who did it my name isJohn King who was like there was anormal interview going on and then rightafter this series of questions beganJared forgot how to speak like how tospeak in complete sentences so hard tolie I mean it is obviously affecting himJared who I didn’t think was capable ofhuman emotions I’m not sure I thought hewas capable of hunger maybe thirst okayfear okay I guess that might have beenthe driving factor there but like that Ijust break down every single thing aboutwhat happened there first he says thatthe president was not racist for 69years nice or however long it was rightand then suddenly is racist right butbut he has been raisedrefusing to cop to that so was thatracist I wasn’t a part of this nobodyasked you you just claimed to knoweverything about this man for the past69 years yeah so were you there were younow every single day absolutely he’sthat kind of guy and then he says itdoes a disservice to people who havesuffered from actual racism which islike an attempt at the kind of argumentsthat conservatives try to make in orderto just confuse people it’s like using atriple negative they’re just like I haveno idea what you’re sayingright but you seemed confident as yousaid it but when you want to talk aboutpeople who were actual victims of racismhow about all the people that weren’tallowed to move into Trump buildingsbecause he had racist tenant policiesabsolutely ridiculous I guess I don’tknow how else his son-in-law is supposedto answer a yes or no question thateveryone knows but we have video proofthere are federal documents from of whatyou’re talking about there’s a full-pagead in The New York Times in 1989 like wehave actual proof of his racism there’sa video of him on the campaign trail youknow so there’s actual proof but I guessI can’t imagine his son-in-law answeringit but any other way wouldn’t it begreat if Jared was like yes thank youfinally yes he’s so racist right exactlyand then he went to dinner with GeorgeConwayit’s just with that relationship Iwonder how Trump can be okay with hisdaughter marrying such a wiener suchlike a limp wiener like that’s what itis and the answer is probably uh he’sfrom a big real estate family who didbetter than mine but he’s never gonnachallenge me as the dominant figure inmy daughter’s lifegreat that’s I think this is the firsttime I’ve really been able to figure outwhat that relationship is like and allhis confidence in Jared Jared might justbe like an okay project manager butnever anything else and what we’ve seenover and over again is that you’re okayuntil you’re not he would Trump yeah sowho knows what the future holdsyeah I don’t know but I wouldn’t skipahead a little bit and talk about Russiaokay okay because uh he was also askedabout that infamous Rushmeeting and like just you know straightup a flick why didn’t you report this tothe FBI why did you go why and there wasa bit of a back-and-forth it’s a I wantto show you here so the question fromswan is does it not set off some alarmbells when you see an email that theRussian government wants to help thecampaign Kushner says the email I got onmy iPhone said show up at 4:00 I didn’tscroll down so on reminds him that ithad Russia in the subject line and thenstill no copping to the reality of thesituation is right there you knew whatthe meeting was gonna be about and so weasked him if this happened again wouldyou report it to the FBI take a look athis answer call the FBI happen again Idon’t know it’s hard to do hypotheticalsbut the the reality is is that we werenot given anything that was salaciousthis wouldn’t be hard for me to dohypotheticals that is any precisehypothetical where you say yes I wouldbecause you’re hiding behind thisconcept that you don’t know the rulesright and you’re just new to this butthe hypothetical answer should be Iwould report it to the FBI it’s theeasiest thing to do unless youconsistently do get invites like thisand just don’t want to cop to that factright you’re right like you know thatit’ll happen again and you you know thatyou won’t report it to the FBI otherwiselike I don’t see how this isn’t sayingyes immediately isn’t a good look forthe administration say yes of course wewould because we didn’t know what wasgoing on we had nothing to do with thatso of course we would but he doesn’twant to answer any questions whatsoeverpursue I mean I just that moment whenthey asked about the racismyeah just like what what would you dowhat I was not involved in that so youyou can’t make an assessment ofbirtherism or any racist act whether itwas racist whether you wanted it tohappen whether you endorsed it becauseyou weren’t involved in it first of allthat’s like the tacit acknowledgementand crappiness that allows racism topersist because people aren’t able tojust say oh no that was bad it wasabsolutely races it was absolutionabsolutely racially motivated and and heshould just cop to thatthank you for watching this clip fromthe damage report for more content fromthe show and access the TYT Networkmembers-only exclusives go to ty-t-dot-com / Brooke wait no it’s twhitey dot-com / John go to t whiteycalm / John to sign up