Most of the failures on “technicalities” (and there weren’t that msny) were due to the incompetence or desperation of the Trump legal team, often they had submitted their case to the wrong court. (For instance going to the federal court with an issue which can only be addressed at the state court).
In a number of cases the Trump suits were thrown out without full consideration by the court. “Wow sounds bad” you say. No. Normal practice. In a preliminary hearing the applicant’s attorneys present an overview of the case they will make. and the judge either says “Yes, sure. Let’s hear that in detail” or, as with many Trump team submissions “You know even if you could prove all that, it wouldn’t make your case. Sorry, not worth going further”
If your best evidence summary fails at preliminary hearing, it means only one thing — your case, and the evidence you want to present really stink.
Post-script: I have noticed that the mass of Trumpistadors who would have posted answers to a question like this a few weeks ago have been remarkably “whittled away”. Not sure if it is fatigue or “buyer’s remorse”.
Anchor asks Republican for concrete proof of fraud (Drop Boxes)
A CNN host just asked a freshman Republican for concrete evidence of fraud.
He maintains that election drop boxes are grounds for overturning the election.
- Drop boxes were ligitated and dismissed with prejudice
- Trump had the opportunity to object to drop boxes months before the election but waited until after he had lost.