Joe Rogan: We are Living in a Time of Adolescent Communication

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/SXOUCRLW2UI” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen></iframe>
41:31
whole mask thing apparently I was like
41:33
really arguing you shouldn’t wear a mask
41:35
or you’re a [ __ ] god it’s but that’s
41:38
also the problem with sound bites on
41:40
Twitter yeah it’s
41:41
you know it exists it’s the content
41:44
factory and you know anybody that
41:46
creates content you know then that goes
41:50
out into the world and look they’re
41:51
looking for for eyeballs to and that’s
41:54
why I always feel like like I take [ __ ]
41:58
but I can’t complain about it because
41:59
that’s part of the guy right that’s part
42:03
of the game that’s what I do for living
42:04
so like when people say let it go
42:06
correctness it’s overwhelming I just say
42:08
like amen it’s just other people pushing
42:12
back and getting to say their [ __ ] and
42:13
that’s exactly what they should be doing
42:16
the internet and it’s democratized you
42:19
know outraged and there’s more speech
42:23
now than there’s ever been before in the
42:25
history of the world like we all know
42:26
you know it’s like that what’s the movie
42:28
with the Mel Gibson where he knows what
42:32
women what would you think Yeah right
42:34
so yeah ESP Twitter and the Internet is
42:38
just we all have developed the ESP and
42:39
now we know what everybody is thinking
42:41
it’s all every day we’re just bombarded
42:44
by what everybody’s saying well you’re
42:46
also bombarded by the people that spend
42:47
the most time doing it because there’s a
42:50
lot of mentally unwell people that spend
42:52
their entire day camp down on Twitter
42:54
having arguments and if you want to
42:57
venture into that world and risk your
42:59
consciousness and your health your met
43:01
your literal mental health by
43:03
communicating in this really crude
43:05
manner with text messages and you know
43:08
arguing over semantics with people that
43:10
you don’t even know it’s it’s a terrible
43:12
way to exist are you on Twitter do you
43:15
have a Twitter account but I don’t read
43:16
it it goes you know I post things on
43:20
inner on Instagram they go to Twitter
43:22
occasionally I’ll post things on Twitter
43:23
but I don’t read it it’s just too toxic
43:26
man I get it you know and I know when I
43:29
[ __ ] up and I know when people are mad
43:31
at me when it’s legit and valid and I
43:33
know when they’re mad at me for nonsense
43:35
and I I’m my worst self critic so I
43:38
don’t need other people yelling at me I
43:40
know what I did wrong and stay clear
43:42
healthy I think that’s the only approach
43:44
you can have in this environment I think
43:46
it’s a healthy way to look at it and you
43:48
know I always try and keep myself like
43:50
you figure when when people are coming
43:52
at it there’s probably to be something
43:54
constructive in there
43:55
sometimes energy to like find it and
43:57
sometimes I’m just like I really can
43:59
used yeah sometimes you can’t do it but
44:01
yeah there’s value in criticism it’s
44:03
very important but not too much it’s
44:05
like anything else like you there’s
44:07
value in a little bit of snake venom you
44:09
develop a tolerance but if you get a big
44:11
fat dose you’re dead and it’s in in many
44:14
ways it’s the same with interacting with
44:16
people that are upset with you there’s
44:17
gonna people people that are upset with
44:19
everybody for no reason no matter what
44:21
the story is in the news even if it’s
44:22
clear-cut to you and I there’s going to
44:24
be someone who has a violent opposition
44:25
to that idea it doesn’t mean they’re
44:27
right it doesn’t mean you’re right it
44:29
just means people have a lot of
44:31
different [ __ ] ways of looking at the
44:32
world and if you want to exist in
44:34
conflict in perpetuity stay on Twitter
44:37
and stay on Twitter all day long and
44:38
just argue with people I don’t want to
44:41
do that you know and again it’s not that
44:43
I don’t have any room for improvement
44:45
it’s not that I don’t appreciate or
44:47
accept or recognize the value of
44:48
criticism because I definitely do it’s
44:50
that it’s not healthy it’s not healthy
44:53
for me it’s not it could directly affect
44:55
the kind of content I put out it’s not
44:57
good that’s what I was upset do you feel
45:00
like one of the hardest thing to do is
45:02
to maintain your kind of creative
45:06
barometer so that you don’t let those
45:10
kinds of things when you feel like
45:13
they’re not constructive pulling it too
45:15
far to the outrage world where some
45:18
other things like to maintain that and
45:21
that’s why I think it’s good like what
45:22
you do in terms of Congress is like you
45:22
you do in terms of Congress is like you
45:24
basically say you know I’m gonna do long
45:27
form because that you know feels like at
45:31
least from my perspective the healthiest
45:33
form
45:34
yeah it’s conversation but is even in
45:37
that case people will take long-form
45:40
edit things out of context and then it
45:42
becomes the same problem that we have on
45:45
Twitter and with everything else you get
45:46
these little sound bites so there’s
45:48
little video clips and you don’t
45:50
understand the full context of the
45:52
conversation or what was actually said
45:54
and then people get outraged at that
45:56
it’s you know it’s we are living in a
45:59
very strange time and I believe it’s an
46:01
adolescent stage of communication and I
46:03
think it’s going to give our
46:04
frustrations for this are going to give
46:06
birth to a better full
46:08
and I think one of the things that
46:09
podcasts what it’s in response to the
46:13
popularity of the long-form is in
46:15
response to people being upset with like
46:18
these traditional late-night talk show
46:20
things where there’s a window here with
46:22
one guy on the right and a window here
46:23
with a guy on the left and there’s a
46:24
person in the center and they’re yelling
46:25
at each other and then you cut to
46:26
commercial and you don’t really feel
46:27
like things got resolved so the response
46:30
to that where people gravitate it’s
46:32
three is theater yeah I think he’s was
46:37
it hard for you you know when we came up
46:39
his comments it was also at that point
46:42
like it was sort of a gladiatorial
46:43
environment you know and I remember you
46:45
know the Boston scene you know was
46:48
always like that’s a tough scene yeah
46:50
he’d come up and it was kind of
46:53
gladiatorial and but you had that
46:55
audience and you develop kind of that
46:57
thick skin is it hard to then make that
46:59
switch in your mind to this different
47:03
form that’s so much more considered so
47:06
much less about conquering the stage
47:11
yeah it is about being open and is that
47:15
something that for you what was the
47:19
switch for you from those two forms
47:22
because that’s and that’s an interesting
47:23
switch well in the beginning there
47:26
wasn’t very good switch you know it’s
47:28
like one of the reasons why the early
47:29
episode sucked it’s like I didn’t know
47:31
what I was doing and I didn’t think
47:32
anybody was listening it was just for
47:34
fun and there was a lot of just hanging
47:36
out with comics and just doing what
47:37
comics do if we were at a diner
47:39
somewhere just talking [ __ ] and making
47:41
each other laugh but we were doing it
47:43
and videotaping it and then along the
47:45
way I started interviewing actual
47:47
interesting people and talking to them
47:49
and having conversations and not you
47:51
know I don’t you know I there’s a place
47:53
for comedy and then I don’t I make a
47:56
really big point in never trying to
47:59
force comedy into places where it
48:01
doesn’t belong that’s I do that also
48:04
with the UFC when I do commentary I’m
48:05
never funny there’s no reason to be it’s
48:07
not what my job is you know and then
48:09
when I’m doing a conversation with
48:11
someone I just try to talk I don’t try
48:14
to be a comic I don’t try I just I’m a
48:16
human I want I want to know what they’re
48:18
talking about and I want to I want to
48:20
get them to expand upon their
48:22
ideas as best they can and I want to be
48:24
engaged that’s what I’m trying to do so
48:27
it wasn’t that it wasn’t that was a big
48:30
transition it was that I had to learn
48:31
how to do this thing
48:33
that I didn’t I think was a skill I
48:34
thought that like being on the radio or
48:37
podcasting you know was just talking
48:39
that’s what I thought it so you’re just
48:40
talking and then I realize no no you’re
48:42
talking in a way that people want to
48:45
listen you’re making it entertaining
48:47
you’re keeping your ego in check you’re
48:49
you’re moving the conversation along way
48:51
not being overbearing you’re not letting
48:54
people ramble too much where it’s boring
48:56
you you got to figure out how to juice
48:57
things up and push them and massage them
48:59
and move him around it’s a skill and I
49:02
didn’t think it was a skill and you know
49:04
and like I said that’s one of the
49:06
reasons when my early episodes suck so
49:07
bad there wasn’t given any consideration
49:10
to the fact that people were listening
49:11
it was just fun we’re just doing it for
49:14
ourselves and then along the way and in
49:17
this house he also speaks to the value
49:19
of criticism I read a bunch of criticism
49:21
about what was wrong with the podcast
49:23
you know that I talk we talk over each
49:26
other I talk too much whatever it was
49:28
and I took it to heart and I would think
49:30
about it I’ll go okay I gotta consider
49:32
that people are listening to this this
49:34
isn’t just what I want to say it’s what
49:36
I want people to hear I know how I want
49:38
it just like stand up you wanted the
49:40
joke to easily enter into a person’s
49:42
mind so it’s so well written and so
49:45
perfectly timed that the audience goes
49:47
John Stewart’s got this I’m just gonna
49:49
sit back and let him take my thoughts on
49:51
a ride and that’s that’s what really
49:53
good stand-up is I mean it’s one of the
49:55
reason why dave was able to do that 8:46
49:58
special that way where he has this long
50:02
drawn-out story with so many important
50:06
points and a few laughs thrown in there
50:08
but so engaged and it’s he’s so you just
50:12
go with him you just let him take you
50:14
just let him take you and that’s that’s
50:16
everything whether it’s someone giving a
50:19
speech or you know I mean even like just
50:24
almost every conversation that we have
50:26
it’s there’s a skill to it that we’re
50:28
not taught I mean you know what it’s
50:30
like to talk to someone where they’re
50:31
not even really talking to you they’re
50:33
just kind of waiting for
50:35
them to talk they’re waiting for you to
50:36
finish so they can talk about themselves
50:37
that’s that’s a real problem with people
50:40
and communicating and I had to learn how
50:42
to I learn how to be a better
50:44
communicator really it also had to be
50:46
authentically you because there is now
50:49
like I think the best measure sometimes
50:52
of art or a standard for those things is
50:55
when you you hear things or see things
50:57
that are uniquely that person like
50:59
nobody could have delivered 8:46 good
51:03
day right line perfect yeah it just
51:06
authentically uniquely in your voice
51:10
that you develop authentically uniquely
51:12
and that’s a hard thing to develop it’s
51:13
funny because I feel like that’s what
51:16
stand-up helped to do for me hmm us when
51:19
you do that in front of our eyes even
51:21
I’ll give like boss as an example you
51:22
know when we’d be working next you do
51:24
that that run of mixes like in the
51:26
framingham and the other ones you know
51:27
we go to the the one in Central Boston
51:31
first and I can remember I hadn’t played
51:36
the room before and I was I was a young
51:37
comic and I just don’t let her and I
51:39
think I’ve gotten like a big break and
51:41
so the guys at Nick’s booked me on that
51:44
run to be a headliner my first run on
51:48
those next properties so I came into
51:50
Nicks and they were just gonna throw me
51:53
up on stage and what they did was so
51:57
such a learning experience because you
51:58
kind of think like I’m on Letterman I’m
52:00
just gonna walk into this place I’m
52:01
coming up from your top bed a comedy I’m
52:04
gonna [ __ ] strut my stuff and Nicks
52:06
and they threw up before me I think it
52:10
was Lenny Clarke Kenny Robertson and
52:14
swinging and I walked in the room and it
52:19
was like Dresden like they had so blown
52:23
that room out with brilliance and then
52:25
it was like and from New York a
52:27
Letterman guy John Stehr and it was it
52:32
was like they were clubbing a baby seal
52:35
I was just but man they did that to
52:39
everybody it but so like wonderfully
52:42
humbling yeah he is it makes you realize
52:44
in the moment like all right
52:46
I’ve got a [ __ ] ton of work to do yes
52:48
like okay just murder it brilliant [ __ ]
52:52
and you’re just like that boy yeah if
52:56
you want to be humbled that the Boston
52:59
comedy scene in the late 80s in the
53:01
early 90s that was the place to be it
53:04
was a great place to develop too though
53:05
because it lets you know I mean you
53:08
never want to be overconfidence one of
53:09
the worst things you could be in
53:10
anything and you never want to be lazy
53:12
if you’re especially when you’re
53:14
delivering something to people that are
53:16
actually paying to see you talk right
53:19
like man there’s such a such a important
53:23
connection that you have to those people
53:25
it has got it you’ve got to do the work
53:28
it’s got to be your best version and if
53:31
you’re not doing that and they know
53:33
you’re not doing that they get angry at
53:34
you it’s like it’s the anger that an
53:37
audience has towards a comic that’s
53:38
bombing is very difficult to describe
53:41
you know like they’re mad they can do
53:43
that too they can talk to like why the
53:45
[ __ ] are you talking like if you’re not
53:48
on in you know there’s real valuable
53:50
lessons to that as a crack coming up
53:52
that you do apply to whether it’s
53:54
podcast and you’re hosting any kind of a
53:56
show ya know there’s a fertility to it
53:58
and if you don’t stay on top of it you
54:00
know the energy that room is is a bear
54:03
that will get up and walk out of the
54:04
room if you’re not careful but it’s
54:07
interesting also though now so you’re
54:08
known now stand up when you’re down
54:11
versus stand up when you’re not there’s
54:13
also a difference because you walk into
54:16
a room when they know you and there is
54:18
you know you don’t have to be as sharp
54:22
if you don’t want to because they’re and
54:23
that’s a discipline as well yeah I mean
54:26
that you’re not coasting on maybe some
54:29
goodwill that they had for you based on
54:32
something else that’s very dangerous
54:33
that’s one of the reasons why the Comedy
54:35
Store is so important because when I go
54:37
there it’s not my crowd it’s my crowd
54:39
and you know Anthony Jeselnik crowd and
54:43
Ali Wong’s crowd and like there’s a lot
54:45
of people there coming to see everybody
54:47
and so and you’re going on after all
54:49
these murderers so it’s when you’re when
54:52
you’re in that kind of an environment
54:53
you sort of have to dot your i’s and
54:55
cross your T’s you got to do the work
54:57
right are you still really involved like
54:59
because for me you know once I did
55:02
started the show and once I had kids
55:04
like I’ll really get to the clubs
55:06
anymore so it almost feels like old
55:09
timers day when I show up showed up he’s
55:13
good you know but I wish I I wish I
55:17
could get out there more and every night
55:18
it would be you know you’re like 8
55:19
o’clock I’m like I should I should just
55:21
drive up to the city and go work the
55:23
cellar and then my wife will be like
55:25
bachelor in paradise is on all right
55:27
yeah yeah well the way I had been
55:31
setting it up at the store was all my
55:33
sets would be after 10 o’clock for the
55:35
most part except rarely rarely I would
55:38
do an 8 o’clock show so everybody would
55:40
be in bed so I’d leave my house and my
55:42
set wouldn’t be probably until 11:00 so
55:45
I’d leave my house and everybody’d be
55:46
asleep and it was perfect and I just and
55:49
I that’s also my favorite time to write
55:51
to I would come home from the store and
55:53
everybody’d be asleep fire up a joint
55:55
and sit in front of laptop and come up
55:57
with some ideas and it’s I had it down
55:59
to a science before the the lockdown
56:01
right has the lockdown mess your
56:06
creature I don’t know I mean I mean my
56:10
comedy routine it certainly has I don’t
56:12
know I mean I’m doing my first shows
56:14
this weekend in Houston I don’t know
56:15
what the [ __ ] gonna happen I don’t
56:17
know if I know how to do it anymore
56:18
that’s gonna be very strange like you
56:23
couldn’t go more into the belly of the
56:24
beast like right juicy yeah like it’s
56:26
like being on the surface of being like
56:28
it’s off your charts with this thing
56:29
yeah I’m gonna go on stage with two
56:30
bottles of Lysol and just you know girls
56:33
do that thing when they spray perfume
56:34
and they walk through it I do that with
56:37
Lysol on stage I mean I think it’s
56:42
really critical to strengthen your
56:44
immune system and I do a lot of things
56:45
to do that and I think that’s something
56:47
that people need to really concentrate
56:48
on and I really wish that our elected
56:50
officials were talking more about that
56:52
and having speeches with doctors and
56:55
doing the office you never shall Obama
56:58
tried to do like try to put kale in
57:01
something and everybody was like what
57:02
I’m sorry go back to tater tots
57:08
yeah I mean just the science on vitamin
57:12
supplementation and how critical it is
57:14
for your immune system particularly
57:15
vitamin D that is that could literally
57:17
save lives and that knowledge is not
57:20
secret that knowledge is out there you
57:22
did those those episodes on the game
57:24
changers the James was and that was it
57:28
was fascinating it was because I watched
57:30
that movie and you know nutrition is
57:33
also like diet is such an important part
57:35
of what we do to ourselves that we that
57:38
we don’t think and especially in a time
57:39
of kovat where so many people like to
57:43
say like when you see what this does the
57:45
people with type 1 diabetes are four
57:47
with other kinds of you know conditions
57:51
that might be caused from either poor
57:53
diet or lack of access to know healthier
57:56
options and things like that you realize
57:58
like [ __ ] we put ourselves in a very
58:01
vulnerable position
58:02
yeah very vulnerable yeah we Andrew
58:05
Schultz had a really good point he said
58:07
this this pandemic highlighted the
58:10
vulnerabilities both in our economic
58:11
system and in our health system like the
58:15
way we are as human beings the what
58:17
who’s vulnerable the obese people people
58:20
with diabetes older folks I mean it
58:22
highlights all these issues where you
58:25
know we we really need to concentrate on
58:28
for the future if you want more people
58:29
to survive this there is there are
58:32
strategies that can be implemented and
58:34
we really we really need to talk to
58:36
people about just being normal stuff
58:38
being D hiding well hydrated making sure
58:41
you’re not dehydrated well rested teach
58:44
people meditation techniques is not hard
58:46
to learn some breathing exercises that
58:48
have been actually proven to increase
58:51
your immune function it’s not hard to
58:53
teach people about vitamin D and
58:55
supplementing it if you can’t go outside
58:56
so how do you get people then to take
58:59
action because here’s the other thing
59:01
you remember like those lives are hard
59:02
yeah you’re dealing when you’re talking
59:04
about like we talked about earlier like
59:06
economic inequality you know it’s hard
59:10
to go into an area where they feel like
59:12
[ __ ] I don’t know where my next meal is
59:13
coming from and be like so here’s what
59:16
we’re gonna do we’re just gonna sit and
59:17
breathe quiet these five minutes and I
59:19
know
59:20
it’s a really difficult it’s like
59:23
hierarchy of needs you know yeah how do
59:26
you how do you work into the idea that
59:30
those types of theories are actually
59:33
important to the betterment of like and
59:36
the stability of the larger part of
59:38
their life when they’re fighting so hard
59:40
just to stay afloat yeah it’s a that’s
59:43
an interesting point and I think what
59:46
you have to do is it has to be first of
59:48
all told by people who are doing it
59:51
successfully so people that are doing it
59:54
that like maybe were struggling with
59:55
their immune system and turned it around
59:58
and got healthier like those people are
60:00
the ones that the people that are in a
60:01
bad position right now they really
60:03
respond to when it comes to you live
60:05
there’s an emotional connection with if
60:07
you see some guide is in the cover of
60:08
Men’s Health magazine he’s ripped and he
60:10
starts talking about fitness you like
60:11
get the [ __ ] out of here I can’t relate
60:13
to you I’m never gonna look like that
60:14
but if you see someone who is in the
60:16
situation that you’re in currently and
60:19
they turned it around
60:21
well that me but listen I’ve been
60:24
working out my whole life I’ve never
60:25
stopped okay but if someone is fat I’m
60:29
talking from their perspective and they
60:30
see some guy who’s really thin and
60:33
chiseled then it’s not going to make
60:34
sense to them that they could ever be
60:36
like that but if they see someone
60:38
there’s a lot of really fantastic photos
60:40
and and and Instagram and Facebook pages
60:43
online where you can get inspiration
60:45
from someone who actually stuck to a
60:47
diet actually stuck to an exercise
60:49
routine and then speaks really well
60:51
about how much it improved the way they
60:54
feel their emotions their depression all
60:56
the aspects of their life and that’s I
60:58
think one of the more like David Goggins
61:00
is a great example that I use him all
61:02
the time because he’s this incredibly
61:04
inspirational guy who was a Navy SEAL
61:07
and at one point in time he’s 300 pounds
61:09
he was drinking milkshakes and he puts
61:10
those pictures of himself on Instagram
61:12
all the time just to let people know hey
61:15
I’m not some alien I’m a person who was
61:18
weak just like you I was lazy I got fat
61:21
and then I figured out how to train my
61:23
mind to be disciplined and I’d figured
61:25
out how to be happier and I think that
61:27
that’s really important for people to
61:29
see that it’s we’re not in a static
61:31
State we’re all in a constant state of
61:34
him
61:34
provement and growth hopefully or
61:35
deterioration if you’re not careful but
61:38
does that you know the thing that I
61:40
worry about those sometimes is similarly
61:43
to economic distress does it make a
61:47
person’s health
61:49
be a function of their virtue does it
61:52
does it take something that is beyond a
61:54
lot of people’s control that isn’t that
61:57
a little bit of like a matter if you
61:59
just pull your pants up you could do it
62:02
like no it’s not it’s known it is the
62:04
way I know what you’re saying but it’s
62:06
not it’s I did this and I can show you
62:09
how I did it and maybe you can do it too
62:11
that’s what it is we don’t have to look
62:12
at every success is somehow or another
62:14
thumbing in the face of people who can’t
62:16
achieve a similar goal but there are
62:20
enough people out there that can that we
62:23
should concentrate on that because I
62:24
think it’ll have a significant
62:25
improvement on the overall health of us
62:27
again as a community and I think this is
62:30
really how we have to look at the United
62:33
States and human beings on earth in
62:35
general we have to look at each other as
62:37
a bunch of people that could very well
62:39
be neighbors we’re community and if
62:41
you’re my friend and you were fat and
62:43
you were willing to listen and I used to
62:46
be fat too and I can tell you hey man
62:48
this is what I did I stopped drinking
62:50
soda was there are people that are I
62:53
mean I understand the point there and
62:56
I’m okay I’m an advocate for plant-based
62:58
stuff I think that’s it’s a healthy way
63:00
to do it
63:01
but obviously eating is such a personal
63:03
experience that I hesitate to ever
63:05
impart that in any other way but I just
63:10
feel like sometimes for people it’s
63:15
almost more debilitating for that
63:18
mentality of this is how you doing just
63:21
gotta get your [ __ ] together and go
63:23
through this way I do think you have to
63:25
present more options but know that it’s
63:28
maybe more complicated and people can be
63:31
overweight or whatever and be healthy
63:33
it’s not necessarily you know something
63:38
that’s corrosive to them but well it is
63:40
though being overweight is necessarily
63:43
corrosive it’s not healthy for anybody
63:44
it’s less healthy
63:47
and being at an optimal weight that’s
63:50
what’s important it gives you some sort
63:52
of a burden
63:53
whether that burden is sustainable is
63:55
debatable maybe for some people it is
63:57
for some people it isn’t look some
63:58
people can smoke until they’re 90 and
64:00
they’re fine
64:01
other people pancreatic cancer like
64:03
Hicks and died in their 30s it it
64:06
depends
64:07
wildly on the person but the idea that
64:10
you can be fat and you can be healthy I
64:12
think is a dangerous narrative because
64:14
you’re telling people listen don’t
64:16
improve you don’t have to you can be
64:19
healthy and be obese at the same time
64:21
but the medical science does not really
64:24
support that the more weight you lose up
64:28
to a certain point you know but when you
64:30
if you get to a healthy body mass your
64:32
body works better it’s really simple it
64:34
doesn’t tax your immune system as much
64:36
doesn’t tax your heart as much it’s
64:38
better for you it’s better for your
64:40
joints it doesn’t mean that we should
64:44
ignore people that are overweight and
64:46
you know and pretend that you know that
64:49
they’re they’re not worthy or they’re
64:51
not they’re not good folks I have a very
64:55
emotional because I feel protective
64:58
you’re nice over people and I I just
65:01
yeah I think you sweetheart it’s great
65:04
that’s a good thing no it is it’s the
65:07
the reason why you’re thinking like this
65:09
because we’re talking right we’re
65:12
talking about people doing well and you
65:13
like [ __ ] what about the people can’t do
65:15
well let’s reach out to them and offer
65:17
them an olive branch and yeah I get it
65:18
man I guess you’re right you’re right
65:20
look I have very good friends that are
65:22
morbidly obese and they don’t want to
65:24
listen and there’s nothing I can do I
65:26
just hug them when I see them and you
65:27
know I hope that one day they come to
65:29
grips with it and they change but they
65:31
don’t have to you know you you live this
65:33
life for a certain amount of time and if
65:35
you want to live it eating cake and
65:36
drinking beer that’s you you do whatever
65:39
you want we’re all on the end in the end
65:41
we’re all gonna be in the ground it’s
65:42
all pointless conversation sort out
65:50
optimistically take in this country and
65:52
turning it around and a very fatalistic
65:55
officer
65:56
well that’s true the end in the end
65:57
we’re all dying
65:58
that’s how that story ends we’re all
66:00
dead so the the story with what I don’t
66:04
want people to do is suffer and I want
66:05
people to feel better while they’re
66:06
alive and I think that’s something
66:08
that’s missed in the message of health
66:10
improvement like you will actually have
66:12
a better experience on earth and it’ll
66:15
help you mitigate stress it’ll help you
66:17
it’ll help you have better relationships
66:19
because you won’t be burdened down with
66:21
a lot of like anxiety and stress that
66:23
literally comes from a physical release
66:25
of energy I look at the body like a
66:27
battery and I think that some people’s
66:29
batteries just overflowing with
66:31
corrosive material because they never
66:33
exert it
66:34
they never blow it out a battery a
66:35
battery is a bad analogy but there’s
66:37
there’s a certain amount of physical
66:39
requirement I think your body has to has
66:42
and if you don’t give that that body
66:44
that physical exertion it doesn’t feel
66:46
good we’re we’ve evolved to hunt and
66:49
gather and build homes and survive from
66:52
predators and we carry around all the
66:54
burdens in our body of this past and
66:57
there’s no getting around that and you
66:59
could either deny it and just deal with
67:01
all the tension or you can exert your
67:03
energy find some way to calm your mind
67:06
and live a life that’s better let me ask
67:10
you a question egg because now this is
67:11
I’m wondering because you’re talking
67:14
about sort of evolving to a place where
67:17
your body and like when you had James on
67:19
and he was talking about babies do you
67:23
have moral qualms about meat or do you
67:26
not like you said well you know we’re
67:28
hunters and and that like is that ever
67:30
an issue for you or is it purely a
67:32
health issue or there’s both things
67:35
there’s a health issue there is a moral
67:37
qualms with factory farming there’s not
67:39
a moral qualms qualms with health with
67:41
hunting because I I know the reality of
67:43
the life of a deer if you don’t kill
67:46
that deer it’s gonna die a horrible
67:48
death from a wolf or a coyote or a
67:50
mountain lion or whatever the [ __ ] gets
67:52
ahold of it
67:53
it’s got Ruiz to death it’s going you
67:55
can either die quickly by the hand of a
67:57
person you respect that life and it’ll
67:59
nurture your body and the bodies of your
68:01
family our problem is a disconnection
68:03
more than anything and let me tell you
68:05
something when the kovat lockdown
68:06
happened I got more requests from
68:08
friends and more requests for
68:09
information about hunting and gun
68:11
ownership how do I
68:12
protect myself and how do I feed myself
68:13
and how do I grow food those were three
68:15
really big questions that I kept getting
68:17
from people it’s fine I have such a
68:19
different perspective on it in terms of
68:22
just the the relationship between myself
68:28
and I didn’t house a big meat-eater was
68:30
a big like deli guy pastrami and corned
68:32
beef and all that my wife got into
68:35
rescue and these types of things and we
68:37
ended over the farm with pigs and goats
68:40
and sheep and things like that and it
68:44
became untenable for me to make that
68:47
decision you know that that sort of that
68:50
decision of I think you’ll be better off
68:53
if I kill you and then it became it was
68:58
something I could no longer manage once
69:01
I knew the process of it and that it was
69:05
a hard it’s been a very hard process for
69:09
me it’s only been about four or five
69:10
years how was your health I mean I’m an
69:14
old Jew so baseline pretty much we don’t
69:20
age well to begin with how old do you
69:23
know John we age a bit like avocados
69:25
when you leave them out
69:26
yeah I’m 57 I’m 52 so or in similar
69:32
boats similar boat you know but I mean
69:36
it’s hard to know I feel good you know
69:39
if you look at markers like cholesterol
69:41
or blood pressure those things it’s
69:44
better but like you say I don’t I don’t
69:48
know enough about how the body processes
69:52
to know if I’m I feel better the numbers
69:56
say I’m better but you know genetics I’m
70:00
sure plays a part in it as well but the
70:03
funny thing is like I don’t even think
70:06
about it anymore
70:06
like it just don’t even think about it
70:08
anymore well let’s get into a custom and
70:12
once your gut biome changes you know you
70:14
really get accustomed to whatever you’re
70:16
eating good or bad unfortunately and
70:18
that’s one of the reasons why people
70:19
have such a hard time quitting sugar and
70:20
bread and pasta and things along those
70:22
lines so your body just craves it that’s
70:24
what it wants we start eating healthier
70:26
food your body does great that can go
70:28
off of meat and still be incredibly
70:30
unhealthy like you know you can be vegan
70:32
and just exist on Lay’s potato chips
70:35
yeah and so it is you know and it’s a
70:38
tougher Road and the world is certainly
70:41
not it’s not built for that and it
70:44
certainly feels a little bit of a
70:49
narrower lane that you have to do and I
70:52
also think it’s an incredibly emotional
70:54
topic yeah like very little that’s as
70:56
emotional and personal as what people
71:00
put in their bodies and how they eat and
71:01
what they do and I’m always very
71:03
respectful because I also I got no leg
71:05
to stand on man I like this is what I’m
71:07
doing it feels better for me but I I
71:11
always say like but it’s such a personal
71:16
and individual choice than you
71:18
everybody’s got to do for themselves
71:20
the only thing I would say is like I do
71:22
think it’s important for people to get
71:24
educated on it to read up on like you
71:27
say factory farming well what might be
71:30
the you know nutritional boss of it or
71:33
what are some of the things that are in
71:35
it or what maybe is it going to do to
71:37
our community when you know we use so
71:40
many antibiotics mm-hmm and the meat
71:42
production ah you know that’s the only
71:45
thing I say is like try and educate
71:47
yourself to how your meal gets to your
71:50
table that’s why I’m a huge advocate for
71:53
like local farming and agriculture
71:55
because those are the people they’re
71:57
just growing their food and they’re
71:58
bringing it to your table I find that
72:00
incredible but but I also don’t I try
72:04
not to take a position of judgment on
72:07
people because I feel like that’s unfair
72:09
but I think that’s very wise of you and
72:11
I think that there’s a lot of people
72:13
that share your position on animal death
72:15
and I think that’s one of the more
72:16
promising aspects of laboratory created
72:18
meat as long as it can be done in a way
72:19
that’s actually going to be healthy for
72:21
us it seems like there’s some real
72:23
science behind that and they’re very
72:25
very close to releasing that a large
72:27
scale so it would be actual meat that
72:29
doesn’t come with death which is really
72:31
fascinating oh really yeah yeah you’re
72:34
talking about like the the the one that
72:36
they had I saw like it’s a tank
72:37
and he pulls out it’s like $20,000 for a
72:40
chicken breast they did that yeah it was
72:42
really expensive at one point in time
72:44
but they’ve gotten it down to a burger
72:46
now like they can actually make a burger
72:48
out of this stuff and they feel like as
72:51
this if this technology improves they
72:53
essentially flesh when it’s not a would
72:57
you if you could if you could still have
73:00
the the part of me that you like but it
73:03
came without death do you think you
73:05
would make that switch or is that
73:06
something that well I certainly would
73:08
with domestic animals the the difference
73:10
between that and hunting there’s there’s
73:12
a conservation aspect of it one thing
73:15
that leads to protection of wildlife
73:18
habitat is actually the money that comes
73:20
from hunting tags and hunting equipment
73:23
there’s that there’s also the the type
73:28
of relationship you have with your food
73:31
when you actually work very hard and
73:34
hunt it and kill it is very different
73:36
than buying food from a store and I
73:40
would say similar in a similar way
73:42
growing food when you go to Whole Foods
73:45
sometimes you really got to stop that
73:47
you know there’s there’s a lot that goes
73:48
into the trip the whole yeah it’s a good
73:52
parking spot that’s right yeah I get it
73:55
growing your own food in your backyard
73:57
is very satisfying to and I would say to
74:00
people like that’s a microcosm I guess
74:03
it’s a very micro form of what it feels
74:05
like to hunt an animal and then eat it
74:07
and feed your family for you know if I
74:08
shoot an elk I eat it literally for a
74:11
year so one animal death equals like a
74:14
year of my meals and you know there’s
74:19
also the moral high-ground position you
74:21
know I think a lot of people love to
74:24
look at the moral high ground of eating
74:27
vegetables and only eating vegetables as
74:29
being a superior way to live their life
74:31
and that’s that’s a good decision I
74:33
understand where you’re coming from I
74:35
understand that there’s people that look
74:37
at life very differently than me they
74:40
maybe don’t have the sort of fatalistic
74:42
perspective even though it’s respectful
74:44
I have a very fatalistic perspective
74:46
when it comes to just all organic
74:48
organisms competing
74:50
for resources and for life these animals
74:54
I mean I’ve run into them when they’ve
74:55
killed each other I’ve seen animals that
74:57
have been taken out by other animals
74:59
I’ve come across their bodies torn apart
75:00
by wolves in in the woods it’s a wild
75:03
wild thing out there man and I think
75:05
we’re so insulated by it in the in our
75:08
culture of today that it’s one of the
75:10
reasons why veganism and all these
75:11
things are becoming so attractive I
75:13
would hope that along with that we’re
75:15
gonna be nicer to each other that we’re
75:17
gonna be we’re gonna grow to be a kinder
75:19
human race I really I really hope you
75:21
that yeah because I think it’s about
75:24
consideration you know for me I think
75:26
was there was a certain part of
75:28
consciousness that I never ascribed to
75:31
animals to some extent I mean it’s funny
75:33
because I always thought of myself as oh
75:34
I you know I love animals I you know
75:36
always had dogs and cats you know you’d
75:38
find a bird with a broken wing just
75:39
thinking the boss and two weeks later he
75:41
flies away and you’re a girl but I never
75:44
really ascribed like individuality to
75:46
them and I think backwards the change
75:48
for me was interacting in in an
75:53
individual way when I get firm on the
75:56
font yeah you know I always tell my
75:59
brother once once we named them that’s
76:01
five yeah you watch them like their
76:04
plate though they’ll play or they and it
76:06
just changed my relationship to what I
76:12
wanted it to be with animals and it just
76:16
made it untenable in that moment for me
76:19
but I truly understand like that that is
76:23
in a really individualized personalized
76:28
experience that that that I made and
76:32
like I said I would love it for people
76:34
to make that connection because I think
76:36
it’s profound there is there is
76:38
something about that connection for
76:39
people that when they do see it you know
76:41
it’s funny I’ll talk about the pigs and
76:44
they’ll be like what you know they’re
76:48
they just eat everything you’re like no
76:49
they’re really playful they’re smart
76:51
don’t go nuts you do belly rubs yeah
76:54
it’s it’s but that was shocking I didn’t
76:56
know that they’d stop oh it’s like a
76:59
blob but beings
77:02
we’re talking about nature John and
77:04
there’s nothing natural about a farm
77:06
that’s part of the problem I mean it’s
77:07
all it’s an animal prison and they’re
77:09
domesticated because we give them food
77:11
and we kind of remove the the natural
77:13
fear that they would have of any you
77:15
know eyeball facing forward predator
77:18
which is what we are you know what their
77:21
health like what having our farm with
77:25
sheep and goats and pigs and they’re all
77:27
rescues is like having a nursing home
77:30
like you can’t believe the fragility of
77:34
factory farmed animals like they are to
77:38
be sick like pneumonia like genetically
77:43
the design to gain too much weight for
77:46
their legs it really is you know the
77:50
island of misfit took like they’ve
77:51
genetically modified or done whatever
77:53
they’ve done and and the health of these
77:57
animals that are in our food supply yeah
78:00
that our mainstay of our food supply is
78:02
really suspect
78:04
yeah that’s why nursing them yeah that’s
78:07
why I prefer hunting the when if you’re
78:09
eating an animal that’s a wild animal
78:12
you’re eating an athlete I mean they’re
78:14
they’re sinewy and thick and they’re
78:16
strong and they survived and there’s so
78:19
much more nutrient-dense
78:21
when you’re when you’re talking about
78:23
factory farmed animals you’re talking
78:24
about I mean well factory fired animals
78:26
is the worst version of what human
78:29
beings are capable of they were capable
78:30
of ignoring suffering to the point we
78:32
lock them all in warehouses they’re
78:34
pissed goes down in a tunnel and fills a
78:36
small lake up and they’ve flown over
78:38
these places with drones it’s horrific
78:39
right the pig farms in particularly
78:41
they’re horrific but when you’re talking
78:44
about what you’re doing on your farm
78:47
like of course you can’t eat those
78:48
things they’re your pets that would be I
78:50
mean you’re naming them and flying them
78:52
and touching them but I extrapolate that
78:55
now so my I think what happened was I
78:57
went all right that’s in the same way
79:00
that like I love my dog but if you have
79:03
a dog I wouldn’t kill your dog running
79:06
eat because I look at dogs now in a
79:09
different way so I think I extrapolate
79:10
to the
79:13
animal kingdom in a way that different I
79:15
had it I feel like because of my wife
79:17
and she’s been she’s a much kinder
79:20
smarter version of me so because of her
79:26
kind of showing me that relationship and
79:28
experiencing myself like it’s just
79:30
changed the way that I view it and
79:33
that’s been and it kind of takes us back
79:35
around to the earlier part of the
79:37
conversation because when you think
79:38
about animal agriculture and you talk
79:39
about those hog farms where are they
79:41
located they’re located in the poorest
79:43
neighborhoods right they locate any
79:46
environmental damage that they do is
79:48
also damage that’s done to poor rural
79:52
communities that live around them now
79:55
I’m not suggesting that there’s not
79:56
economic there’s an economic incentive
79:59
and an industry around it and certainly
80:02
not you know you don’t just end
80:04
industries but reform again like it it
80:10
certainly Georgia P Bush said this he
80:14
was talking about Donald Trump because
80:15
I’m gonna support Donald Trump because
80:18
Donald Trump is the only thing standing
80:20
between America and socialism and I was
80:24
like the only thing standing between
80:26
American socialism is an inability to
80:29
meaningfully reform capitalism and it’s
80:32
more damaging effects and if we can’t do
80:35
that then the people take to the streets
80:38
I think reform like Bernie was talking
80:43
about those other guys that will save
80:45
capitalism that will save democracy by
80:48
showing that we recognize that there is
80:51
collateral damage to the systems that we
80:54
use to gain wealth and to gain power and
80:57
if we can reform those systems
81:00
meaningfully for the people who suffer
81:03
most terribly under them we save it but
81:08
if we can the best deal gets stormed
81:11
like that’s just what Kennedy say if you
81:13
make peaceful evolution impossible you
81:15
make violent revolution inevitable yeah
81:17
so we I think at some point we have to
81:20
demonstrate the
81:21
we’ll and the stamina to be able to
81:24
attack these problems and that’s why I’m
81:26
holding Joe Rogan ah yeah no I think
81:31
everyone agrees but everyone feels like
81:33
their hands are tied and again I think
81:35
that’s one of the reasons why these
81:37
protests and just this this whole
81:39
explosion after George Floyd has been so
81:43
transformative I think because people
81:45
recognize like this is a real moment of
81:47
change and of course opportunists and
81:49
looters and all kinds of other crazy
81:50
[ __ ] happened along the way but it’s it
81:53
speaks to the fact that there’s so many
81:55
people in street it’s beats it speaks to
81:57
this this like we can actually do
81:59
something now we’ve got momentum let’s
82:01
keep it moving
82:02
are you hopeful yes I’m always hopeful
82:04
I’m very optimistic even though I have a
82:06
fatalistic perspective exact same
82:10
in these terrible times how do you
82:12
remain Oakland I’m like because better
82:15
people outnumber shitty people yes a
82:17
long shot they dish that’s just the
82:20
truth there was some time powerless
82:23
sometimes we may act out of fear or
82:26
resource part whatever that is good
82:28
better people outnumber shady people by
82:31
launch and we’re in an adolescent stage
82:34
of our evolution of as a civilization
82:37
it’s growing and changing there’s never
82:39
been a civilization like us today and
82:41
we’re growing and changing to try to
82:44
suit our real sensibilities and to try
82:47
to to try to get better at this [ __ ]
82:49
thing and not just accept this old crazy
82:52
corrupt structure that’s existed forever
82:55
thank you yeah you put a little fire in
82:58
my belly like this like I really enjoyed
83:03
I’ve really enjoyed the conversation
83:05
this is man I always enjoy talking to
83:07
you I appreciate you very much and I
83:09
don’t get to see you enough all right my
83:11
friend and hopefully when this all ends
83:14
everybody can gather again at the you
83:16
know at the store and had do a good set
83:19
and talk some shared with each other and
83:20
have some fun let’s do it brother
83:22
take care my friend and good luck with
83:23
your film irresistible it’s out when now
83:28
tomorrow tomorrow please jump
83:33
thank you my brother thank you sir bye
83:34
[Applause]
83:38
[Music]
83:39
[Applause]
83:44
[Music]

What explains elite contempt for Joe Rogan? – System Update with Glenn Greenwald

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/S0tFgPG26vA?start=3766″ frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen></iframe>
very soon thereafter she converted
58:57
into a real enemy she emerged two months
58:59
later and wrote this
59:01
article aggressively condemning the idea
59:04
that trans women should be able to
59:06
compete in female athletic and female
59:10
athletics because it the the the kind of
59:13
intolerance for her even asking
59:17
converted her it alienated her converted
59:19
her into an enemy and
59:20
it seems like people who don’t care
59:22
about outcomes are about winning
59:24
really don’t get bothered by that but
59:27
let me just ask you about one
59:28
the kind of the last um
59:32
kind of prong of the case of the liberal
59:34
case against joe rogan i find this one
59:36
really interesting
59:37
too which is you know people say
59:41
okay fine he he liked bernie like tulsi
59:45
um and yet i believe in 2016 if i’m not
59:48
mistaken
59:50
he said that he was voting for trump
59:51
over hillary
59:53
and i’m certain that after saying that
59:56
he
59:56
thought bernie was the best candidate
59:58
and really like tulsi
59:59
he’s now saying i can’t vote for biden i
60:02
probably would vote for trump over biden
60:05
which would is leading ripples to say to
60:07
people like you
60:09
why would we possibly why should we
60:12
possibly regard somebody
60:14
as an ally who is
60:18
saying twice now that they’re going to
60:19
vote for donald trump and i guess like
60:21
an
60:21
ancillary part of that question is you
60:24
know there is this phenomenon of people
60:26
who twice voted
60:27
for barack obama and then voted for
60:29
donald trump in 2016
60:31
not a small number a large number and
60:33
here in brazil
60:34
same thing you know a lot of people who
60:35
voted for bolsonaro in 2018
60:38
were people who voted for the workers
60:40
party four consecutive
60:42
elections so if you’re kind of a
60:44
political junkie who relies on the
60:46
polarization of choose between rachel
60:48
maddow and sean hanovey
60:50
it doesn’t make any sense that somebody
60:52
could do that to say i like bernie
60:54
but i’m gonna vote for trump because you
60:56
have to pick an ideological box
60:58
and joe rogan clearly is a person
61:01
who doesn’t think that way and i think
61:03
there’s like this liberal sense that
61:05
that makes him bizarre when in fact
61:07
i think it makes him pretty common it’s
61:09
one of the reasons why people like him
61:11
because he’s not in one of those boxes
61:13
but what do you say to liberals who
61:15
would make that argument that how can we
61:17
consider somebody supporting
61:19
this authoritarian racist for president
61:22
to be an ally
61:25
well i mean there are two things that
61:26
you you have to kind of
61:29
kind of set the record straight on first
61:31
is that i i’m pretty sure in 2016 he
61:33
voted for gary johnson so he voted for a
61:35
libertarian i don’t think he voted for
61:37
trump in 2016.
61:39
um and in 2020 again he first you know
61:42
supported tulsi
61:43
then he supported bernie um and then
61:46
most recently if you really
61:48
look at his comments it’s not that he’s
61:49
saying he’s endorsing trump but he’s
61:51
saying that
61:52
he would he would vote for trump um
61:55
as a result of the party choosing biden
61:57
because he just doesn’t think biden can
61:59
do the job
62:00
just from a kind of mental age
62:04
decline standpoint so it’s not like the
62:06
most heartfelt support of trump but yeah
62:08
i mean
62:08
let’s set that aside and just say okay
62:10
like he’s willing to vote for trump
62:12
right
62:12
um i mean the idea that you wouldn’t
62:15
want to engage
62:16
someone who is willing to go from the
62:19
most
62:20
liberal the most left candidate in the
62:23
democratic primary and willing to then
62:26
switch over to trump
62:27
i mean you know it’s the argument that
62:29
the left’s been making
62:30
for you know for years now right that
62:33
like
62:33
these this is the is the guy to be
62:36
studying right he’s the one that we can
62:38
kind of crack the code on
62:40
um as for you know why that’s the case
62:43
i think it’s real again it’s really
62:45
threatening i don’t think
62:46
you know i think the democratic
62:48
establishment what i tend to tell people
62:49
is that the democratic establishment
62:52
their main priority is not really to
62:54
actually even win elections
62:56
it’s to keep control of the democratic
62:58
party right like that’s where most of
63:00
their power comes from it’s certainly
63:01
where
63:02
their most reliable source of power
63:04
comes from it’s keeping control of the
63:05
party because as long as you can
63:07
keep control of the party and you keep
63:08
control of the cultural
63:10
um levers of power in the country
63:13
you’re always going to be able to
63:15
command 50
63:16
of the political system you’re always
63:18
going to be able to command
63:20
um you know the entire media apparatus
63:23
that’s devoted to politics right you’re
63:25
good
63:25
or at least half of it right you’re
63:27
going to in control the liberal half
63:29
and so i think it’s i i mean i it’s
63:32
i’m sorry to say but i think it’s a
63:34
really cynical calculation
63:36
that cultural elites and democratic
63:39
party elites are making when they make
63:41
these decisions because when when you
63:43
engage joe rogan
63:45
and you engage his viewers you’re being
63:47
bringing in
63:48
a ton of people who you can’t
63:50
necessarily rely on to keep these clean
63:52
lines of political and cultural
63:54
engagement you’re
63:55
you’re completely blowing up the
63:57
political system you’re you’re blowing
63:59
up the racket
64:00
right and why would you want to do that
64:02
because at the end of the day
64:04
hell trump could get reelected and
64:05
they’d still control the party they can
64:07
still control the other half they’d be
64:10
raising hundreds of millions of dollars
64:12
for their think tanks and therefore you
64:14
know the media institutions and so
64:16
it’s a great racket why would you risk
64:18
that just for
64:19
winning you know the presidency for
64:21
maybe four years eight years
64:22
don’t get me wrong obviously they’d like
64:24
to win that too
64:26
but i don’t think that’s the real game i
64:27
don’t think that’s ever been the real
64:28
game
64:30
we saw that in the uk right where the
64:33
centrists and playwrights and moderates
64:36
who controlled the labor party
64:38
levers of power forever whether they
64:40
were in power out of power
64:42
when they lost control of their own
64:44
party to jeremy corbyn
64:46
they it was very obvious if you’re just
64:48
paying minimal attention but we now know
64:50
from documents that have been leaked and
64:51
reports that have been issued
64:53
they were actively working against the
64:56
labor party they preferred
64:58
to destroy corbyn and retake control
65:01
of the party even if it meant empowering
65:04
the tories and making boris johnson
65:06
prime minister because as you say
65:09
their top priority is ensuring that they
65:11
maintain
65:12
control of their party and secondary
65:15
or even more distantly is actually
65:18
winning elections
65:19
um and you know i think that you know
65:22
it’s like when people ask me why i go on
65:23
tucker carlson i
65:24
can barely even understand the question
65:26
because it’s such an obvious answer
65:28
which is
65:29
because there are four million people
65:30
watching and whatever percentage it is
65:33
that i can reach in any way not
65:34
necessarily change their minds instantly
65:37
but just kind of make them a little more
65:38
open
65:39
to hearing from different people maybe
65:41
get them kind of unsettled about
65:44
who they should be paying attention to
65:46
or introducing some ideas that maybe
65:48
maybe it’s ten percent maybe it’s five
65:50
percent maybe it’s fifteen percent
65:52
why would i ignore that if i actually
65:54
care about outcomes
65:55
to watch you know i i it kind of shocked
65:58
me edward snowden
65:59
uh appeared on rogan’s show for the
66:02
second time this week and so i went back
66:03
to look at what the audience was the
66:05
first time he appeared which is
66:06
about 10 months ago and even though
66:09
edward snowden being edward snowden kind
66:11
of spoke in like a monologue form for
66:13
about
66:14
three hours you know and he was
66:16
obviously remote because he couldn’t
66:18
go to the studio since he’s trapped in
66:19
russia the audience for that
66:22
appearance from edward snowden just on
66:25
youtube never mind all the other
66:26
platforms
66:27
was 15 million people 15 million
66:31
um which is you know four or five times
66:34
the size
66:35
of a primetime cable host even on their
66:37
best night
66:38
and obviously by virtue the fact that
66:40
you watch it that people
66:42
listen to it and can hear him say i
66:44
support tulsi or i support
66:46
bernie obviously there’s huge numbers of
66:48
those
66:49
that audience that are very reachable
66:51
from a liberal perspective
66:53
anybody who says i don’t want to have
66:56
anything to do
66:57
with a show that reaches 15 million
66:59
people
67:00
is somebody to me who’s saying
67:04
i look at politics as about everything
67:06
other than
67:07
winning wielding power and changing the
67:10
world
67:11
right right and they shrouded in moral
67:13
language right they shrouded
67:15
in how could you associate with someone
67:17
like that how could you you’ll be
67:18
tainted by someone like that
67:20
um they shrouded in those things but at
67:22
the end of the day it’s a much more
67:24
cynical calculation it’s
67:25
it’s put forth as some kind of moral
67:28
decr
67:29
declaration but it’s really a cynical
67:31
calculation
67:32
calculation in terms of controlling the
67:33
party in terms of controlling cultural
67:36
power centers
67:37
why would we want to upset that this is
67:40
a great setup
67:41
um and yeah that’s why you see 15
67:43
million people tuning in to edward
67:45
snowden because it completely cult
67:47
cuts across all of these cultural lines
67:50
i mean there aren’t
67:51
you know being interested in edward
67:53
snowden just his story and what he did
67:55
and the cultural and political impact he
67:57
had
67:58
that’s not a liberal or conservative
68:00
idea that’s
68:01
that’s reaching millions of people um
68:03
but that’s just not interesting to
68:05
um what informs the you know the the
68:08
careers and the lifestyles of the people
68:10
that
68:11
sort of hold these both the political
68:13
and cultural
68:14
levers of power in the country yeah so
68:16
yeah so thanks very much for
68:18
for taking the time i i think is a
68:20
really important topic not just
68:22
because it’s important to understand the
68:24
phenomenon of joe rogan although that
68:25
is important there are very few people
68:28
having the kind of cultural
68:30
and political impact that he’s having
68:34
um in a reaching a group of people who
68:38
often tune out politics or who aren’t
68:40
engaged in the traditional ways which
68:42
makes him
68:44
even more important than just the
68:45
numbers alone but i do think too
68:47
the reaction to him tells us a lot about
68:50
how media figures view their position
68:52
how liberals view what their political
68:54
project uh is and so
68:56
um i i think your your analysis on
69:00
twitter and the discussion that we just
69:02
had
69:02
um has really clarified those issues in
69:05
in a really helpful way so thank you so
69:07
much for
69:08
taking the time to talk to me um and i
69:10
hope people will tune into your
69:13
back channel youtube program where
69:14
you’re doing a lot of these kind of
69:15
header docs
69:17
uh discussions with people across a wide
69:20
range of
69:21
ideological and cultural uh belief
69:24
systems so

What explains elite contempt for Joe Rogan? – System Update with Glenn Greenwald

35:27
great you know there’s just tremendous
35:29
homogeneity now in in american culture
35:32
right
35:32
uh it’s the idea that these are the
35:34
types of people
35:36
who should be both in charge
35:39
of talking about liberal left
35:42
politics and who should really be in
35:44
charge of the country in general there
35:45
are people who right now have cultural
35:46
hegemony in this country
35:48
right um and it’s the idea that these
35:51
people
35:52
are sort of the these are the people who
35:55
embody
35:56
what should be american morality right
35:58
now right these are the people who
36:00
embody what that is and
36:01
should hold the cultural level levers of
36:04
power in the country and who
36:05
should have the power to be speaking on
36:09
uh the important topics of the day
36:12
so that’s sort of what i mean by that
36:14
what is joe what does joe rogan
36:16
lack on that list of
36:20
attributes that people think define
36:22
those who should be
36:23
exerting influence and power over our
36:25
discourse in politics
36:27
well i think what he lacks is i mean
36:30
the most important thing he lacks is
36:33
the um willingness to exclude everyone
36:36
else from the debate who isn’t a part of
36:39
that culture i mean i think that’s
36:40
probably the primary thing that enrages
36:43
them
36:43
is that he i mean one of the reasons why
36:47
his show is so popular is that it’s a
36:49
really powerful cross-pollination
36:51
of ideas of different fields of
36:53
different
36:54
industries people from all these
36:56
different walks of life
36:58
um it’s you know it’s it’s a great
37:00
reflection of internet culture you know
37:01
one of the reasons why the show is so
37:03
popular is that it kind of operates on
37:04
internet time
37:06
right as opposed to you know cable news
37:08
that
37:09
is kind of really slow to pick up on
37:11
things probably because of its older
37:12
demographic whereas
37:14
joe rogan is able to seize on something
37:16
that appeared on a message board
37:17
yesterday right and i mean even if you
37:19
watch his show
37:20
um they’re able to fact that fat check
37:23
themselves in real time right he’s got
37:25
his sidekick there jamie who
37:27
pulls something up to verify whether
37:29
what joe
37:30
what joe just said is totally full of
37:32
i mean that’s not something you’re
37:33
going to see chris hayes do
37:35
or sean hannity do right like that’s
37:37
just not the way it works
37:38
everyone’s online today i mean the
37:41
entire country is essentially getting
37:42
email
37:43
and facebook and all that jazz like why
37:45
bother
37:46
doing it in this particular medium that
37:49
has an inherent time constraint
37:51
well you’re right i mean the internet
37:53
has revolutionized
37:55
politics and in many ways good ways we
37:58
use
37:59
our social media our email list which is
38:01
very large
38:02
we every day we’re sending out stuff and
38:04
other candidates are doing it the same
38:05
way
38:05
but television still has a very
38:07
important role to be playing um and so
38:09
probably it’s it’s partly that uh and
38:12
it’s
38:12
and it’s partly you know his his
38:15
willingness
38:16
to transgress on issues that are
38:19
considered
38:20
sacred right not necessarily obviously
38:23
the big one nowadays is the trans issue
38:25
the transgenderism issue
38:26
he’s willing to talk about that and he’s
38:28
willing to bring in
38:30
um perspectives on it that right now
38:33
liberals are just have
38:34
zero zero tolerance for um and so
38:38
so let me let me let’s stop there for a
38:40
second so
38:42
you know i’m i’m i’m i to kind of
38:46
present what i think would be the
38:49
best or strongest case that a liberal
38:52
would make for why joe rogan ought to be
38:54
regarded
38:56
certainly not as an ally and even as an
38:58
enemy
38:59
and one is the one that you just put
39:01
your finger on so this week there was a
39:03
report in vice
39:05
that employees of sportify which is the
39:08
platform that essentially just paid joe
39:10
rogan
39:11
in excess of 100 million dollars for his
39:14
show exclusively to appear there
39:16
are upset um and it came from
39:20
how they what they described themselves
39:22
as being lgbtq
39:24
a i plus employees
39:28
and allies so not just the lgbtqai plus
39:33
employees but also their allies are
39:36
upset because
39:38
in particular he has had on his show
39:41
number one an author who has argued
39:45
that there are times when young people
39:49
are influenced to believe
39:53
that they have gender dysphoria and to
39:55
even begin
39:56
irreversible transitions when in fact
40:00
they don’t have gender dysphoria because
40:02
of the culture that is encouraging them
40:05
to think that to what
40:06
in other words questioning whether young
40:08
people are being misdiagnosed
40:10
with gender dysphoria who don’t in fact
40:12
have it and there are definitely people
40:14
who
40:14
have said that they have been that
40:16
they’ve gone through that process only
40:17
to realize that
40:19
that wasn’t their issue so that was one
40:22
of the problems is just
40:23
airing an author who did research and
40:26
science
40:27
who said that to some extent people are
40:30
being misdiagnosed
40:31
and then i guess the other one was him
40:33
being an mma fan
40:35
a fighting fan as you alluded to earlier
40:38
questioning whether it’s fair
40:40
to allow uh trans women who
40:44
live their lives uh as biological men
40:47
who went through puberty as biological
40:49
men who developed muscle mass and
40:50
hormones and
40:52
um the entire physiology of a man to
40:55
then
40:56
transition and compete with cis women
41:00
something that people like martina
41:01
navratilova who’s been a long time
41:04
advocate for trans people have asked as
41:06
well and that
41:07
essentially this demonstrates his
41:09
willingness not just to air these
41:11
views but to even kind of wonder them
41:13
himself
41:14
suggests that he’s transphobic which is
41:16
a form of bigotry
41:18
and we ought not to have any kind of
41:21
alliance with
41:22
or support for people who are bigots
41:25
that’s one of the
41:27
cases that is made against joe oregon
41:29
why isn’t that valid
41:30
so i mean it goes to the point that i
41:32
that the question you just asked
41:34
me and the point that i made which is
41:36
that you know
41:38
what makes what makes it what makes joe
41:41
rogan
41:41
seen as not an ally and you know
41:45
what makes him come across as not an
41:47
ally is that he is not
41:48
actively engaged in the culture war
41:50
right i mean what’s so crucial to people
41:53
who are actually
41:54
actively engaged in liberal culture war
41:56
is that you have to be
41:58
actively seen as saying you know this is
42:00
our line and anyone who does not
42:03
um hew to this line is the enemy right
42:06
and if you’re not
42:06
a part if you’re not a part of the
42:08
solution you’re a part of the problem
42:09
essentially
42:10
and so when joe rogan someone like joe
42:12
rogan comes along and says hey there are
42:14
some interesting issues here hey
42:16
let’s talk about this hey there are some
42:18
certain scientific studies
42:19
that immediately raises all the alarms
42:22
in people’s heads
42:24
saying that uh oh this is not one of us
42:26
this is not one of the allies right like
42:28
this isn’t someone who is going
42:30
to be doing the work that we define
42:32
ourselves by
42:33
the work of advancing the culture war
42:37
right and if you’re not advancing the
42:39
culture war
42:40
then you’re as good as the enemy if not
42:42
the enemy is ironic right because like
42:44
george george bush’s
42:45
911 formulation that liberals
42:48
incessantly not just mock but we’re
42:51
very alarmed by was that you know
42:54
every country has a choice you’re with
42:56
us or you’re with the terrorists it’s
42:58
one or the other there’s no middle
43:00
ground if you’re not
43:02
actively supporting what we’re doing
43:03
we’re going to regard you as an
43:05
ally of the terrorists or even one of
43:08
the terrorists and that means that
43:10
for example in the culture war you
43:13
become the enemy not merely by
43:16
advocating against trans rights but
43:20
questioning the premises the science
43:23
behind the implications of these very
43:25
profound social changes
43:27
that a lot of people are advocating
43:29
right and and that’s what you saw from
43:30
this vice article right
43:32
um it was actually a perfect case study
43:35
i mean first of all the headline said
43:37
joe rogan’s transphobic episode or
43:40
something like that or
43:41
transphobic joe rogan you know it
43:43
clearly editorialized before you even
43:45
you didn’t i mean you didn’t even have
43:47
to read the article right like you you
43:48
just read the headline and you know
43:50
exactly what the article is saying
43:52
but beyond that it also completely
43:55
sidestepped the debate as we’re just
43:56
saying now right
43:58
this episode that they’re talking about
43:59
that that’s causing all the drama
44:01
internally and spotify if you watch it
44:04
there’s
44:04
two important things to know about it
44:06
first of all before
44:08
anything happened and again the reason
44:10
why this stuff works so well is because
44:12
no one actually listens to the episodes
44:13
who care involved in this
44:15
in this war right in these battles
44:16
because or they see
44:18
like one minute chosen snippets
44:20
deliberately selected to
44:22
cast it in the responsible light right
44:26
right exactly but so he starts off right
44:28
off the bat and he’s
44:29
and he says this episode is not about
44:31
adults right
44:32
this is not about trans adults we
44:34
completely believe in trans adult rights
44:37
we believe in their identities
44:38
we are completely supportive of them um
44:41
i joe rogan and completely a supporter
44:45
of trans adults right so that’s
44:46
important to set aside
44:48
um because right off the bat you know
44:50
that he’s not talking about
44:52
tran the idea of transgenderism in
44:54
general obviously right
44:56
you can’t i’ve heard him say before i’ve
44:58
heard him say before
45:00
not only do i fully support the complete
45:04
range and panoply of
45:07
robust equal legal rights for trans
45:09
people
45:10
and not only do i believe that they have
45:12
the absolute right to live their lives
45:14
with full and complete dignity and
45:15
liberty
45:16
which is consistent with his overall
45:18
philosophy i’ve heard him say
45:20
i have nothing but love in my heart for
45:22
trans people in fact
45:23
admiration for people who are willing to
45:27
defy societal convention to be
45:29
who they are so it’s almost like even on
45:32
the question of trans issues
45:34
from a liberal perspective he’s way
45:38
ahead of
45:39
the vast majority of where the
45:40
population is in terms of how he talks
45:42
about it
45:43
um so you’re right he he carves out this
45:47
kind of
45:48
you know um territory that he’s saying
45:51
i’m not
45:52
questioning the rights fully of trans
45:55
adults to live a complete and full
45:57
life filled with dignity and love um
46:01
so what is it that that became
46:02
problematic
46:04
so what became problematic is that you
46:06
know the rest of the show
46:08
is devoted to the issue of children
46:11
who you know children teenagers
46:15
people going through adolescence who
46:18
come across the idea of transgenderism
46:21
and think that maybe transgenderism has
46:24
some kind of answers
46:26
for what may be the natural kind of
46:29
patterns and challenges that children go
46:32
through in young age
46:33
um you know normally and also you know
46:36
in these days
46:37
we’re suffering through a mental health
46:38
crisis right one that probably
46:40
even preceded um coded but has just been
46:44
amped up
46:44
greatly during covid right but generally
46:47
the
46:47
the idea and the author of the book who
46:49
i will say you know the the author of
46:51
the book the title
46:52
was a little bit sensationalist and i
46:54
think that’s probably driving a
46:56
little bit you know it’s something like
46:57
they’re coming for our daughters or
46:58
something like that which you know
47:00
listen i if i was advising someone to
47:02
write a book that you want well received
47:03
broadly
47:04
you might do a better job with the title
47:06
but and that’s not and that’s not a book
47:09
written by joe it’s not a book written
47:10
by joe rogan it’s a book written
47:14
not always favorably right he
47:16
interrogated that person on
47:17
a lot of those premises exactly and he
47:20
did and he did do a good job of actually
47:22
kind of talking about the cover and
47:23
saying well why did you go with this
47:24
cover
47:25
and i mean it was he did this job on
47:27
that end actually right
47:28
um but more importantly this entire
47:32
episode was talking about
47:33
whether there’s an issue with kids
47:37
that you know kind of exploring
47:39
transgenderism and actually
47:41
moving forward with it when maybe it’s
47:43
not it maybe it’s
47:44
sort of a product of just a tumultuous
47:47
adolescence and maybe
47:49
allowing children to do this and engage
47:51
in this is maybe not the right move
47:53
essentially saying
47:54
maybe these children who think they’re
47:55
trans aren’t actually trans and maybe we
47:58
should be
47:58
engaging the science engaging um
48:02
engaging the experts on this issue to
48:04
kind of sort this out so that
48:06
you know we’re not we’re not kind of
48:09
sending people
48:10
on this path that will sort of you know
48:12
uproot their lives and
48:14
things that they’ll have to undo later
48:16
on and just causing more trauma into
48:18
adulthood right
48:19
it’s a way to argue against that which
48:20
is to say well no we’ve talked to the
48:22
experts and the experts say this isn’t a
48:24
widespread
48:25
issue or when we interrogate these
48:27
children who think they might be trans
48:29
there are real reasons why they think
48:31
they are or you know look into that
48:33
literature
48:33
bring it up bring the experts in and
48:35
actually engage this debate but of
48:37
course that’s not what they’re in for
48:38
right like this that’s not what this is
48:40
about
48:40
this is about immediately kind of
48:43
shutting down the debate
48:44
and saying okay you’re on the you’re not
48:47
you’re not advancing
48:49
the the cause the trans cause and the
48:51
broader culture cause so you’re clearly
48:52
part of the problem you’re not being an
48:54
ally right and that’s why
48:56
this word ally is has become so
48:58
important and this broader kind of
49:00
critical theory culture war
49:02
um dynamic is because this idea of ally
49:07
it’s not just it’s not a it’s not just
49:09
an affirmational
49:11
kind of identity of being an ally but
49:12
it’s a negational identity right what
49:14
it’s saying is that
49:15
if you’re an ally it means you’re
49:17
actually part of this
49:19
right you’re not you’re not someone who
49:21
is just letting it happen or working
49:23
against us if you’re not an ally
49:25
it’s not just that you’re being lazy
49:26
they’re not trying to you know when they
49:28
say you’re not an ally what they’re
49:29
saying is that you’re the enemy
49:31
right yeah you know there’s several
49:32
there’s there’s a couple things really
49:34
interesting to me about that which is
49:36
obviously part of my formative
49:38
experience in
49:39
being politically engaged was being part
49:43
of the gay rights movement
49:44
in the late 80s or even the mid 80s to
49:48
late 80s when i kind of came of age as
49:51
a gay teenager in the reagan years there
49:53
was obviously just like there is against
49:56
trans people now it sustained an
49:57
organized demonization campaign
49:59
right obviously the people who were just
50:02
you know
50:03
close-minded malicious bigots
50:06
were not people that you regarded as
50:08
allies those are people you were willing
50:09
to kind of demonize and scorn but the
50:11
reason why
50:13
that debate ended up being won by
50:16
advocates of
50:17
gay equality was because we were
50:19
constantly searching for ways to
50:22
engage people and to change their minds
50:24
and
50:25
encouraging those questions to be asked
50:27
based on the recognition
50:29
that if you want to usher in very
50:31
profound
50:32
changes to how society functions
50:35
and do so in a way that requires a
50:38
majority to support you
50:40
even though the majority is not um part
50:43
of the group who’s
50:45
on be on whose behalf you’re advocating
50:48
dialogue
50:48
and engagement is crucial and so people
50:51
who want to
50:52
engage and ask questions are are things
50:54
that you’re happy about not people that
50:56
you want to denounce
50:57
the other thing i find so um
51:00
kind of baffling and confounding about
51:03
this
51:04
taboo on asking in particular
51:07
whether or not children or teenagers are
51:11
being
51:12
uh misdiagnosed with gender dysphoria
51:15
for cultural reasons or social reasons
51:17
or because the
51:18
the understanding of it is so
51:19
preliminary um
51:21
aside from the fact that just in general
51:23
you want medicine and science and
51:26
mental health uh professionals always
51:29
asking
51:30
whether misdiagnoses are taking place
51:32
but
51:33
there’s this kind of morality now as i
51:35
know all too well and as people have
51:37
been seeing
51:38
you know it’s kind of made its
51:40
appearance in the alex morse
51:41
scandal where there’s this now
51:44
growing uh orthodoxy among
51:49
in left global politics that if you’re a
51:51
young adult
51:53
23 21 20 you lack the capacity to make
51:58
decisions for yourself that are truly
52:00
consensual about who you want to date
52:02
who you want to have sex with
52:03
frequently people cite neurological
52:06
research that says your brain isn’t
52:07
fully formed
52:09
and that therefore if someone is 28 or
52:11
30 like alex morse was
52:13
he shouldn’t be dating or having sex
52:14
with 21 or 22 year olds even if they say
52:17
they want to
52:18
because 21 and 22 year olds aren’t
52:20
capable of making
52:21
a much a pretty limited choice do i want
52:23
to have sex with this person on this
52:25
particular night or date them and yet
52:27
those same people who say that 21 year
52:30
olds or 20 year olds
52:31
aren’t capable of deciding for
52:33
themselves whether to date an older
52:35
person or whether to have sex with an
52:36
older person
52:37
want to put it off limits whether a 14
52:41
year old or a 15 year old
52:43
is sufficiently mature and has the
52:46
emotional sophistication
52:48
to make permanent life-altering
52:50
decisions about
52:51
what their gender is to the point of
52:53
having surgeries or
52:55
hormonal treatments that will alter
52:57
themselves
52:59
forever um and you know i think that
53:03
um one of the
53:07
kind of uh phenomenon that we’re seeing
53:10
in liberal
53:10
culture increasingly that’s reflected in
53:13
this treatment of joe robin
53:15
rogan as a homophobe not for saying
53:17
anything disparaging
53:19
about trans people or advocating against
53:21
equal rights quite the contrary
53:23
he he he doesn’t do that he advocates
53:26
for rights
53:27
is the idea that simply asking questions
53:29
even in response to things that probably
53:31
ought to be interrogated
53:33
is considered itself almost as bad as
53:37
malice and bigotry itself they’re kind
53:40
of equated
53:41
in a way that just will inherently repel
53:44
people from a political movement that
53:46
says
53:47
that if you have questions you have no
53:49
right to ask them and simply asking them
53:51
makes you a bad person
53:53
right and and the the i think the uh the
53:56
tying
53:56
kind of thread there is that this is
53:59
again it’s it’s about this delineation
54:02
that we have to make between liberal
54:04
politics and liberal culture
54:05
and the culture war um this is very much
54:08
about
54:09
a culture that has de-prioritized
54:12
political outcomes right
54:14
uh we see that with your example that
54:16
you just made
54:17
um with the gay rights movement we also
54:19
saw that with the alex morse campaign
54:20
right
54:21
we saw people who were much more focused
54:24
on maintaining
54:25
the integrity and the purity of the
54:28
battle they’re engaged in culturally
54:30
even at the expense of achieving real
54:33
political outcomes
54:34
right and as you just said you know
54:36
engaging debates is
54:38
is how you actually you know having that
54:41
cross-pollination of ideas
54:42
and and actually persuading people
54:44
actually engaging in persuasion
54:47
um rather than just kind of identifying
54:49
who’s on in my tribe who’s in your tribe
54:51
that’s how you achieve political
54:53
outcomes it was the same with the alex
54:54
morse right where it was
54:56
an allegation was made and we
54:58
immediately have to believe the
54:59
allegation
55:00
not investigate it because if you are a
55:03
you know if you’re a denier or if you
55:05
even hesitate to believe
55:07
what’s happening then you are not
55:09
promoting this broader idea
55:12
that there are victims in the world and
55:14
we’re not
55:15
kind of invested further investing in
55:16
the idea of victimization right
55:19
um victimization is this really core
55:21
concept to this culture where right like
55:23
we have to believe that there are
55:24
victims and we have to always support
55:27
the creation of new categories of
55:28
victimhood and if we don’t and if we’re
55:31
not engaged in that struggle
55:33
then we’re not pushing the culture war
55:34
and again it just shows
55:36
that maintaining the integrity of this
55:38
culture war is far
55:39
more important than even the political
55:41
outcomes and i think there may be some
55:43
very tangible reasons for that i think
55:45
a lot of the people that are engaged in
55:46
this stuff are people who do derive
55:49
power from cult power powerful cultural
55:51
centers right they work in academia
55:54
they work in the media and that’s how
55:55
they exert their power
55:57
over politics and over society because
55:59
again culture is how
56:01
we talk about ideas culture is how
56:04
we mold political ideas and say which
56:07
ideas can connect together which people
56:09
can connect together who can
56:10
hang out with who how cool you know
56:13
culture builds coalitions right
56:16
it builds political coalitions so um
56:19
i think there’s a very real reason why
56:22
people
56:22
are very concerned about maintaining the
56:25
integrity of this liberal culture
56:28
it’s because that’s where they derive
56:30
their power and in fact
56:32
you know they’re i mean it’s not a
56:34
surprise to see especially
56:35
now seeing cultural elites feel so
56:38
disempowered democratically right they
56:40
feel so politically disempowered
56:43
um that they would kind of throw
56:45
themselves completely into this culture
56:47
war because that’s the only place where
56:48
they can exert their power now right
56:50
and that’s why we see these insane sorts
56:53
of um
56:55
kind of concessions to even corporate
56:57
culture where they’re
56:59
so excited to allow corporations to
57:01
censor
57:02
free speech they’re so excited to allow
57:04
hr departments to and you know
57:06
indoctrinate people and run
57:08
programs on people and force people in
57:09
these programs where the people are
57:11
literally denouncing themselves because
57:13
of the way they’re born
57:14
it’s exerting power through culture
57:16
because you can’t do it politically
57:18
anymore politically it’s a lot harder
57:20
you have to get the people on your side
57:21
why would you want to get the people on
57:23
your side that’s a pain in the ass
57:24
so yeah exactly um so
57:28
and and i do think it’s interesting as
57:30
well that
57:31
that this whole concept of whether you
57:33
care about power or not because
57:35
you know i watched i mentioned martina
57:37
navratilova earlier who um
57:40
you know is obviously a person who i pay
57:42
attention to i’ve talked about before
57:44
and written about before how she was my
57:45
childhood hero
57:46
i was working on a film about her and it
57:48
was amazing to watch
57:49
that this person who is like one of the
57:52
main 20th century pioneers
57:54
of feminism she did as much to create
57:58
space for the ability of female athletes
58:01
to compete on equal terms with male
58:03
athletes in terms of money and
58:04
sponsorships and
58:05
corporations is probably anybody except
58:08
for billie jean king
58:09
she had a trans coach in 1883 and was
58:11
defending
58:13
not just lgbts and was one of the few
58:14
openly gay celebrities or athletes of
58:17
that era
58:18
you know all she kind of did was say hey
58:21
i’m kind of confused
58:23
is all you is the only thing you have to
58:25
do to enter
58:26
female professional sports and win all
58:29
the cash
58:30
awards and and prizes and trophies is
58:34
declare yourself a woman or are there
58:35
protocols
58:36
she was really asking earnestly and
58:39
in response she was just mauled um
58:42
with no generosity no kind of
58:46
you know uh consideration for her whole
58:48
history she was just instantly declared
58:50
a bigot the more she tried to defend
58:52
herself
58:53
the worse it got and then eventually
58:55
very soon thereafter she converted
58:57
into a real enemy she emerged two months
58:59
later and wrote this
59:01
article aggressively condemning the idea
59:04
that trans women should be able to
59:06
compete in female athletic and female
59:10
athletics because it the the the kind of
59:13
intolerance for her even asking
59:17
converted her it alienated her converted
59:19
her into an enemy and
59:20
it seems like people who don’t care
59:22
about outcomes are about winning
59:24
really don’t get bothered by that but
59:27
let me just ask you about one
59:28
the kind of the last um
59:32
kind of prong of the case of the liberal
59:34
case against joe rogan i find this one
59:36
really interesting
59:37
too which is you know people say
59:41
okay fine he he liked bernie like tulsi
59:45
um and yet i believe in 2016 if i’m not
59:48
mistaken
59:50
he said that he was voting for trump
59:51
over hillary
59:53
and i’m certain that after saying that
59:56
he
59:56
thought bernie was the best candidate
59:58
and really like tulsi
59:59
he’s now saying i can’t vote for biden i
60:02
probably would vote for trump over biden
60:05
which would is leading ripples to say to
60:07
people like you
60:09
why would we possibly why should we
60:12
possibly regard somebody
60:14
as an ally who is
60:18
saying twice now that they’re going to
60:19
vote for donald trump and i guess like
60:21
an
60:21
ancillary part of that question is you
60:24
know there is this phenomenon of people
60:26
who twice voted
60:27
for barack obama and then voted for
60:29
donald trump in 2016
60:31
not a small number a large number and
60:33
here in brazil
60:34
same thing you know a lot of people who
60:35
voted for bolsonaro in 2018
60:38
were people who voted for the workers
60:40
party four consecutive
60:42
elections so if you’re kind of a
60:44
political junkie who relies on the
60:46
polarization of choose between rachel
60:48
maddow and sean hanovey
60:50
it doesn’t make any sense that somebody
60:52
could do that to say i like bernie
60:54
but i’m gonna vote for trump because you
60:56
have to pick an ideological box
60:58
and joe rogan clearly is a person
61:01
who doesn’t think that way and i think
61:03
there’s like this liberal sense that
61:05
that makes him bizarre when in fact
61:07
i think it makes him pretty common it’s
61:09
one of the reasons why people like him
61:11
because he’s not in one of those boxes
61:13
but what do you say to liberals who
61:15
would make that argument that how can we
61:17
consider somebody supporting
61:19
this authoritarian racist for president
61:22
to be an ally
61:25
well i mean there are two things that
61:26
you you have to kind of
61:29
kind of set the record straight on first
61:31
is that i i’m pretty sure in 2016 he
61:33
voted for gary johnson so he voted for a
61:35
libertarian i don’t think he voted for
61:37
trump in 2016.
61:39
um and in 2020 again he first you know
61:42
supported tulsi
61:43
then he supported bernie um and then
61:46
most recently if you really
61:48
look at his comments it’s not that he’s
61:49
saying he’s endorsing trump but he’s
61:51
saying that
61:52
he would he would vote for trump um
61:55
as a result of the party choosing biden
61:57
because he just doesn’t think biden can
61:59
do the job
62:00
just from a kind of mental age
62:04
decline standpoint so it’s not like the
62:06
most heartfelt support of trump but yeah
62:08
i mean
62:08
let’s set that aside and just say okay
62:10
like he’s willing to vote for trump
62:12
right
62:12
um i mean the idea that you wouldn’t
62:15
want to engage
62:16
someone who is willing to go from the
62:19
most
62:20
liberal the most left candidate in the
62:23
democratic primary and willing to then
62:26
switch over to trump
62:27
i mean you know it’s the argument that
62:29
the left’s been making
62:30
for you know for years now right that
62:33
like
62:33
these this is the is the guy to be
62:36
studying right he’s the one that we can
62:38
kind of crack the code on
62:40
um as for you know why that’s the case
62:43
i think it’s real again it’s really
62:45
threatening i don’t think
62:46
you know i think the democratic
62:48
establishment what i tend to tell people
62:49
is that the democratic establishment
62:52
their main priority is not really to
62:54
actually even win elections
62:56
it’s to keep control of the democratic
62:58
party right like that’s where most of
63:00
their power comes from it’s certainly
63:01
where
63:02
their most reliable source of power
63:04
comes from it’s keeping control of the
63:05
party because as long as you can
63:07
keep control of the party and you keep
63:08
control of the cultural
63:10
um levers of power in the country
63:13
you’re always going to be able to
63:15
command 50
63:16
of the political system you’re always
63:18
going to be able to command
63:20
um you know the entire media apparatus
63:23
that’s devoted to politics right you’re
63:25
good
63:25
or at least half of it right you’re
63:27
going to in control the liberal half
63:29
and so i think it’s i i mean i it’s
63:32
i’m sorry to say but i think it’s a
63:34
really cynical calculation
63:36
that cultural elites and democratic
63:39
party elites are making when they make
63:41
these decisions because when when you
63:43
engage joe rogan
63:45
and you engage his viewers you’re being
63:47
bringing in
63:48
a ton of people who you can’t
63:50
necessarily rely on to keep these clean
63:52
lines of political and cultural
63:54
engagement you’re
63:55
you’re completely blowing up the
63:57
political system you’re you’re blowing
63:59
up the racket
64:00
right and why would you want to do that
64:02
because at the end of the day
64:04
hell trump could get reelected and
64:05
they’d still control the party they can
64:07
still control the other half they’d be
64:10
raising hundreds of millions of dollars
64:12
for their think tanks and therefore you
64:14
know the media institutions and so
64:16
it’s a great racket why would you risk
64:18
that just for
64:19
winning you know the presidency for
64:21
maybe four years eight years
64:22
don’t get me wrong obviously they’d like
64:24
to win that too
64:26
but i don’t think that’s the real game i
64:27
don’t think that’s ever been the real
64:28
game
64:30
we saw that in the uk right where the
64:33
centrists and playwrights and moderates
64:36
who controlled the labor party
64:38
levers of power forever whether they
64:40
were in power out of power
64:42
when they lost control of their own
64:44
party to jeremy corbyn
64:46
they it was very obvious if you’re just
64:48
paying minimal attention but we now know
64:50
from documents that have been leaked and
64:51
reports that have been issued
64:53
they were actively working against the
64:56
labor party they preferred
64:58
to destroy corbyn and retake control
65:01
of the party even if it meant empowering
65:04
the tories and making boris johnson
65:06
prime minister because as you say
65:09
their top priority is ensuring that they
65:11
maintain
65:12
control of their party and secondary
65:15
or even more distantly is actually
65:18
winning elections
65:19
um and you know i think that you know
65:22
it’s like when people ask me why i go on
65:23
tucker carlson i
65:24
can barely even understand the question
65:26
because it’s such an obvious answer
65:28
which is
65:29
because there are four million people
65:30
watching and whatever percentage it is
65:33
that i can reach in any way not
65:34
necessarily change their minds instantly
65:37
but just kind of make them a little more
65:38
open
65:39
to hearing from different people maybe
65:41
get them kind of unsettled about
65:44
who they should be paying attention to
65:46
or introducing some ideas that maybe
65:48
maybe it’s ten percent maybe it’s five
65:50
percent maybe it’s fifteen percent
65:52
why would i ignore that if i actually
65:54
care about outcomes
65:55
to watch you know i i it kind of shocked
65:58
me edward snowden
65:59
uh appeared on rogan’s show for the
66:02
second time this week and so i went back
66:03
to look at what the audience was the
66:05
first time he appeared which is
66:06
about 10 months ago and even though
66:09
edward snowden being edward snowden kind
66:11
of spoke in like a monologue form for
66:13
about
66:14
three hours you know and he was
66:16
obviously remote because he couldn’t
66:18
go to the studio since he’s trapped in
66:19
russia the audience for that
66:22
appearance from edward snowden just on
66:25
youtube never mind all the other
66:26
platforms
66:27
was 15 million people 15 million
66:31
um which is you know four or five times
66:34
the size
66:35
of a primetime cable host even on their
66:37
best night
66:38
and obviously by virtue the fact that
66:40
you watch it that people
66:42
listen to it and can hear him say i
66:44
support tulsi or i support
66:46
bernie obviously there’s huge numbers of
66:48
those
66:49
that audience that are very reachable
66:51
from a liberal perspective
66:53
anybody who says i don’t want to have
66:56
anything to do
66:57
with a show that reaches 15 million
66:59
people
67:00
is somebody to me who’s saying
67:04
i look at politics as about everything
67:06
other than
67:07
winning wielding power and changing the
67:10
world
67:11
right right and they shrouded in moral
67:13
language right they shrouded
67:15
in how could you associate with someone
67:17
like that how could you you’ll be
67:18
tainted by someone like that
67:20
um they shrouded in those things but at
67:22
the end of the day it’s a much more
67:24
cynical calculation it’s
67:25
it’s put forth as some kind of moral
67:28
decr
67:29
declaration but it’s really a cynical
67:31
calculation
67:32
calculation in terms of controlling the
67:33
party in terms of controlling cultural
67:36
power centers
67:37
why would we want to upset that this is
67:40
a great setup
67:41
um and yeah that’s why you see 15
67:43
million people tuning in to edward
67:45
snowden because it completely cult
67:47
cuts across all of these cultural lines
67:50
i mean there aren’t
67:51
you know being interested in edward
67:53
snowden just his story and what he did
67:55
and the cultural and political impact he
67:57
had
67:58
that’s not a liberal or conservative
68:00
idea that’s
68:01
that’s reaching millions of people um
68:03
but that’s just not interesting to
68:05
um what informs the you know the the
68:08
careers and the lifestyles of the people
68:10
that
68:11
sort of hold these both the political
68:13
and cultural
68:14
levers of power in the country yeah so
68:16
yeah so thanks very much for
68:18
for taking the time i i think is a
68:20
really important topic not just
68:22
because it’s important to understand the
68:24
phenomenon of joe rogan although that
68:25
is important there are very few people
68:28
having the kind of cultural
68:30
and political impact that he’s having
68:34
um in a reaching a group of people who
68:38
often tune out politics or who aren’t
68:40
engaged in the traditional ways which
68:42
makes him
68:44
even more important than just the
68:45
numbers alone but i do think too
68:47
the reaction to him tells us a lot about
68:50
how media figures view their position
68:52
how liberals view what their political
68:54
project uh is and so
68:56
um i i think your your analysis on
69:00
twitter and the discussion that we just
69:02
had
69:02
um has really clarified those issues in
69:05
in a really helpful way so thank you so
69:07
much for
69:08
taking the time to talk to me um and i
69:10
hope people will tune into your
69:13
back channel youtube program where
69:14
you’re doing a lot of these kind of
69:15
header docs
69:17
uh discussions with people across a wide
69:20
range of
69:21
ideological and cultural uh belief
69:24
systems so
69:24
thanks very much sean yeah thank you so
69:27
much i enjoyed it
69:36
you