My intuition has been quite strong my entire life, I just didn’t realize it, I was interpreting what I was feeling based on what older folks who wanted control were telling me about myself.
As I grew older, I became much more introverted. To be alone with my thoughts. To learn why I feel things the way I do.
Intuition is your survival instinct.
However, in a world where everyone lives to be 100, most people don’t need to heed their intuition to survive. Ever.
Your intuition is anxiety. Anxiety is good. Anxiety means you need to move away from that situation. If you let someone else decipher your anxiety, they’ll make you feel like it’s just you; NEVER give another human the opportunity to TELL you what you’re feeling. You can never come back from that — they have just assumed control of your feelings and will take advantage of that when the time is right. They might tell you that you have depression so they can tell the boss they helped you work out your depression and get credit for something that was never there. Or they might discredit anything you ever say again because you’re emotionally unstable thus prolonging the anxiety.
Intuition isn’t meant to be discussed with others. Since we are all animals, apex predators, intuition must be strongest in those most capable of surviving. You don’t see animals discuss with each other before they run away from something scary — they just start running because they want to survive.
This world creates problems so it can create solutions, remember that.
Not everyone put in charge of you is there to help you. On a micro scale concerning individual interactions, you have most likely encountered individuals whom act illogically over and over prolonging the issue at hand and asking for help over and over or a boss constantly changing the rules once you’ve gotten the current system down pat.
When there is a clear divergence between logic and emotion, and the edge begins to rise in your chest, remove yourself from the situation. Don’t discuss it with others.
We Arrest Journalists For Free Press, But That’s Not A Violation Of Free Press
What IMF Policies propose for Bitcoin and Crypto
I’ve been behind enemy lines reading everything the IMF has put out in the last 2 years.
Here are 10 pieces I found most relevant to Bitcoin.
“When you are thoroughly conversant with strategy, you will recognize the enemy’s intentions and thus have many opportunities to win.”👇 pic.twitter.com/ssDWlWpDGZ
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
Let’s start with the IMF’s note titled “Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms: A Primer for Supervisors”
It might as well have been titled “Slander Proof of Work and Promote Proof of Stake”.
Here is an excerpt that sums it up in a nutshell👇 pic.twitter.com/JYAJsjnPnK
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
You read that right…the IMF hints that virtual assets are being used to finance the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Is there any evidence of the direct connection between VAs and weapons of mass destruction? 😂
I didn’t find any, but it sure does sound scary!
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
Here, the IMF explores how to regulate virtual assets (VAs).
“VAs pose a significant threat to the integrity of the global financial system, money laundering, terrorist financing, and the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction”
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
They support FATF guidelines that VASPs do due diligence on customers & non-customers for transactions that are >$1,000.
They acknowledge the threshold is lower than traditional standards, but they argue that given the “particular risks of VAs”, stricter standards are justified.
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
The IMF justifies stricter standards despite a recent report that found illicit activity consisted of 0.15% of crypto volume.
Also, don’t forget that AML policies have impacted only 0.05% of criminal finances.
This appears to be more about control rather than stopping crime. pic.twitter.com/XKbOOgIokt
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
In this IMF report, I came across a new term, “cryptoization”, which refers to the risk of currency substitution occurring in emerging markets.
The IMF now has a term for when citizens opt out of their failing local currencies into digital assets…
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
The IMF would prefer people not to have an exit at all, which is why they’re so excited about CBDCs.
This paper is an overview of 6 of the most advanced CBDC projects: China, Bahamas, Sweden, Canada, Uruguay, and the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union.
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
None of the CBDC projects covered fully protect user privacy.
Some of them offer “quantitative restrictions” in that they offer anonymity for “lower tier” people to help them onboard if they don’t have IDs.
Central banks make the rules that determine who gets privacy and why. pic.twitter.com/O7GU3JOIDb
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
This contains remarks from an IMF employee on how CBDC design choices can overcome the risks.
It displays the coercive nature of CBDCs and the power it would grant central banks. Notice the choice of words: “limit”, “restrain”, “impose”, and “capped”. pic.twitter.com/AOYgGWU6Q4
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
On CBDC development, they write, “The IMF is collaborating with the BIS, the CPMI, and the FSB to establish relevant guidelines.”
That’s multiple non-governmental organizations designing the future global financial system with zero oversight.
Who voted for any of these people? pic.twitter.com/FrztxsP3UL
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
10.)https://t.co/pXQcLnCxqI
Lastly, this interview in the IMF’s flagship magazine, proves the IMF is well aware of the real risks posed by CBDCs but is continuing with its plans anyway.Author Eswar Prasad candidly explained to an IMF employee the danger that exists with CBDCs👇 pic.twitter.com/yfOtFh6Fxc
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
This one argues for a transition to electronic money to enforce negative interest rates.
They stress that a design requirement of CBDCs is they must be interest-bearing to allow for the implementation of negative interest rates.
How about…no.🖕
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
From their own publications, one can see how the IMF attacks Bitcoin.
They scold PoW’s energy and criticize Bitcoin for facilitating illicit activity to justify regulatory overreach.
They push CBDCs and centralized PoS coins as viable alternatives cuz they’re easier to control.
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
PoW vs PoS/CBDCs and BTC vs ESG
These are the battlegrounds.
The IMF wants to push PoW alternatives because they allow them to enforce their unsound policies with impunity. Negative interest rates, surveillance, inflation, etc.
The IMF can’t exert its power & control with PoW.
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
Only Bitcoin is decentralized & censorship-resistant. Its energy use enables it to function as sound, incorruptible money.
Bitcoin consumes ~0.05% of global energy consumption.
So why all the fuss about Bitcoin?
It’s because Bitcoin can’t be controlled..and the IMF hates that. pic.twitter.com/a0imgJgP60
— Sam Callahan (@samcallah) April 21, 2022
Tesla gets kicked off S&P ESG List, where Exxon Mobile holds a top spot.
“Petty Tyrant” : This American Life
In Schenectady, New York, a school maintenance man named Steve Raucci works his way up the ranks for 30 years, until finally he’s in charge of the maintenance department. That’s when he starts messing with his employees. Teasing them at meetings. Punishing them with crummy work assignments. Or worse things, like secretly slashing their tires in the middle of the night.
Ten years after his arrest, Steve Raucci broke his silence and gave an interview to Paul Nelson at the Times Union in Albany.
Act OneAct One
Sarah Koenig tells Raucci’s story—the story of a virtuoso tyrant and bully, a man who made himself feared and untouchable, in a place where no one thought to look for a tyrant. (28 minutes)