Ask HN: How does diversity improve product development?

One of the recent emails said diversity improved products. I’ve racked my brains and can’t think of how this can be the case–on the whole.

I could understand having someone with cultural knowledge doing UX. But, say, a programmer? Does, for example, a Welsh person create better APIs by virtue of being Welsh? That doesn’t follow!

One anecdote I can think of here is that when the Apple health app was released it didn’t have a period tracker. If more women were involved with that application it likely would’ve had one.

reply
Good example.I think in general women take care of their health more than men. Women may well have been the main users of the app(?).

Not having people who represent your main/large user groups does seem problematic.

I don’t think it calls for automatic diversity, still. Instead, a definite consideration of who is using the product.

reply
I worked for Aflac for over five years. They have a good track record as an ethical company that treats employees really well, etc. They also have a good track record on diversity specifically.They always said something like We hire “everyone” because we sell to “everyone.” There are things you just will not think of if you are not part of a particular subgroup.

The other thing I will suggest is that in order to have diversity internally, you need a certain level of general respect for people of a sort that fosters good communication. If your people are too similar, the odds are really good that there will be implicit bias showing in how you word things or whatever. This implicit bias will be something that seems innocuous to insiders. Most people are not very welcoming of hearing that the way they do things smacks of implicit bias. This feels really ugly to them, so it is incredibly hard to change such things. Even if someone is willing and able to point it out, most people will not only not listen, they will actively deny it. But if you have a lot of implicit bias, most people won’t even try to tell you that you are doing this Thing that excludes them and others like them.

I do blog a bit about such topics and would be happy to pull up a relevant post or two from my blog if you are interested. I have a track record of promoting diversity in online forums and I appear to be the highest ranked openly female member of HN.

 

 

 

We’re Already at Dow 30000, You Just Don’t Know It

The blue-chip index is a poor measure of what investors are doing

One big reason: Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The Dow’s strange focus on share price gives far more weight to Goldman than the bank’s market value deserves. At $236.59 a share, it is the most expensive stock in the average, meaning it has twice as much of an effect on the average as Apple Inc., which has a market capitalization more than six times that of Goldman.

Apple may have finally gotten too big for its unusual corporate structure

No management is happening in Omaha. Instead, the company’s various divisions — whether it’s a freight railroad or a mobile home manufacturer — have their own corporate functions, including things like HR and legal.

.. there’s no senior vice president for iPhone who works alongside a senior vice president for Mac. Nobody is in charge of Macs or iPhones or iPads or really anything else, because Apple is almost entirely functional.

.. In that divisional context, Ahrendts’s job would be to optimize for the profitability of Apple’s retail stores. But Apple doesn’t want its retail stores to be optimized for profitability. The stores do bring in money, but they are also important marketing statements whose existence, design, and operation is supposed to project the Apple brand in specific ways.

.. top executives are responsible for things like “software engineering” and “hardware technologies” (i.e., chip development) rather than for specific products.

.. But most CEOs do not attempt to manage enormous global companies with purely functional structures, because even though it sounds good, it’s extraordinarily difficult to make it work in practice.

.. Of course, it might be hard to bring radical redesigns and breakthrough innovations to the Mac. But what existing Mac customers really want is something more basic: confidence that Apple will regularly update the Mac to incorporate new chips as they become standard in the rest of the computer industry.

.. even though regularly updating desktop Macs should not be that difficult, objectively speaking, it tends not to happen in part because it’s not anyone’s job to make it happen.

Apple Drops Hints About Working on Self-Driving Cars

In letter to U.S. transportation regulators, Apple said it is investing heavily in machine learning and automation

Apple “is investing heavily in the study of machine learning and automation, and is excited about the potential of automated systems in many areas, including transportation.”

.. Alphabet Inc.’s self-driving project had already collected more than 2 million miles of public-roadway testing and General Motors Co. this year competed a $1 billion deal to acquire Cruise Automation to jump start its autonomous vehicle program.