Yesterday evening while I was watching Donald Rumsfeld's speech, at the Council on Foreign Relations on C-SPAN, three things struck me:
"I've been informed that this occasion is also being webcast. Someday I'm going to have to figure out what that means exactly, but it's apparently very significant" (audience laughs) (21:50/53:56)
"I find when I come to New York, there's always somebody in the room who's the world's leading export on a subject that I get asked about..
and so I'd like you to identify yourself right now... All right then forever hold your peace...
I am told, and it's not authoritative.." (28:30/53:56)
This was in preface to his answer about missing Iraqi museum items, and given the context, a excellent piece of self deprecation.
The journalist was pressed for her credentials (she was a freelancer) and treated as an outsider. Her question wasn't even terribly biting-- what are you going to do to prevent people like Saddam from using the banking system to hide their assets-- but I got the sense that journalists were not welcome in the audience. (46:20/53:56.2)
This got me thinking about all the webloggers who are experts in their fields and how their expertise is presented and viewed.